Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SIGMA EXTRUDING CORP.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SIGMA EXTRUDING CORP. in 627 NORTH LANE AVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32254 (NAICS 326112). OSHA activity number 348335126.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sigma Extruding Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sigma Extruding Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
627 NORTH LANE AVE
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32254
Mailing
627 NORTH LANE AVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32254
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326112
Employees
118
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2025
Penalty
Initial $14,895 · Current $7,448 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation and/or nip points:  a.    At the facility located at 627 North Lane Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida:  On or about June 21, 2025, and at times prior, on Line 104 in the production area of the facility, the employer exposed employees to an amputation hazard, in that the Upper 1008D Winder Shaft did not have a guard properly installed to provide protection of nip points while employees were loading/unloading cores on the shafts.  b.    At the facility located at 627 North Lane Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida:   On or about June 21, 2025, and at times prior, on Line 104 in the production area of the facility, the employer exposed employees to an amputation hazard, in that the Lower 1008D Winder Shaft did not have a guard properly installed to provide protection of nip points while employees were loading/unloading cores on the shafts.  c.     At the facility located at 627 North Lane Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida:   On or about June 21, 2025, and at times prior, on Line 105 in the production area of the facility, the employer exposed employees to an amputation hazard, in that the Upper 1008D Winder Shaft did not have a guard properly installed to provide protection of nip points while employees were loading/unloading cores on the shafts.  d.    At the facility located at 627 North Lane Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida:   On or about June 21, 2025, and at times prior, on Line 105 in the production area of the facility, the employer exposed employees to an amputation hazard, in that the Lower 1008D Winder Shaft did not have a guard properly installed to provide protection of nip points while employees were loading/unloading cores on the shafts.  e.     At the facility located at 627 North Lane Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida:   On or about June 21, 2025, and at times prior, on Line 106 in the production area of the facility, the employer exposed employees to an amputation hazard, in that the Upper 1008D Winder Shaft did not have a guard properly installed to provide protection of nip points while employees were loading/unloading cores on the shafts.  f.   At the facility located at 627 North Lane Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida:   On or about June 21, 2025, and at times prior, on Line 106 in the production area of the facility, the employer exposed employees to an amputation hazard, in that the Lower 1008D Winder Shaft did not have a guard properly installed to provide protection of nip points while employees were loading/unloading cores on the shafts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7447.5
  • — Z (S) $14895

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2025
Penalty
Initial $10,641 · Current $5,321 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours:  a.    At the facility located at 627 North Lane Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida: On or about June 21, 2025, the employer failed to report a work-related incident involving an amputation within 24-hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5320.5
  • — Z (O) $10641

View Sigma Extruding Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348335126.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.