STOW, OH —
OSHA Inspection: P3 INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of P3 INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. in 671 MCCAULEY ROAD, STOW, OH 44224 (NAICS 325510). OSHA activity number 348339367.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- P3 INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
- Site address
- 671 MCCAULEY ROAD
- City
- STOW
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44224
- Mailing
- 671 MCCAULEY ROAD, STOW, OH 44224
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325510
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E02 II B 2
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $1,135 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(ii)(b)(2): More than 120 gallons of Category 2, 3, or 4 flammable or combustible liquids in containers were located outside of inside storage room(s) or storage cabinet(s): On or about June 27, 2025, the employer did not ensure the quantity of Category 2, 3, or 4 flammable liquids outside of an inside storage room or storage cabinet in a building or in any one fire area of a building did not exceed 120 gallons. In the flammables area, the employer stored approximately 4 gallons of Category 2 liquids, and 245 gallons of Category 3 liquids.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1135
- — Z (S) $2270
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $1,135 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about June 27, 2025, the employer failed to implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear full face and N95 respirators while making materials used in producing road coatings, traffic markings, and bridge coatings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1135
- — Z (S) $2270
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about June 27, 2025, the employer failed to provide a medical evaluation to employees required to wear an N95 or full face respirator while making materials used in producing road coatings, traffic markings, and bridge coatings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): On or about June 27, 2025, the employer failed to fit test employees required to wear an N95 or full face respirator while making materials used in producing road coatings, traffic markings, and bridge coatings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: On or about June 27, 2025, the employer failed to ensure employees required to wear N95 and full faced respirators while making materials used in producing road coatings, traffic markings, and bridge coatings did not have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and face.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Nov 14, 2025
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide to employees required to use respirators, annual and more often if necessary, effective respiratory protection training that was comprehensive and understandable: On or about June 27, 2025, the employer failed to provide effective respiratory protection training to employees required to wear an N95 or full face respirator while making materials used in producing road coatings, traffic markings, and bridge coatings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at P3 Infrastructure, INC.
View P3 Infrastructure, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325510)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348339367.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.