Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: NEW QUALITY CONSTRUCTION INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NEW QUALITY CONSTRUCTION INC in 79 ELLIOTT STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348346289.

Watch NEW Quality Construction INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NEW Quality Construction INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
79 ELLIOTT STREET
City
DANVERS
State
MA
ZIP
01923
Mailing
45 EAGER CT, MARLBOROUGH, MA 01752
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $3972.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees selected by, and under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration.  Location: Job site;  On or about 07/01/2025, employees were allowed to utilize Alum-A-Pole pump jack scaffolding which was not erected by experienced employees under the supervision of a competent person qualified in scaffolding erection. The deficiencies with the pump jack scaffolding units which were not correctly erected or whose deficiencies were not identified and corrected prior to usage by a competent person are noted in the subsequent violations in 1-1-b through 1-1-d.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $3972
  • — I (S) $1986
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.  Location: Job site;  On or about 07/01/2025, the employer allowed employees to utilize 2 Alum-A-Pole pump jack scaffolding which did not bear on base plates, mud sills, or other adequate firm foundation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).  Location: Job site;  On or about 07/01/2025, employees were exposed to a live overhead electrical service drop which was entering the building from the utility pole which was in direct contact with the Alum-A-Pole pump jack scaffolding unit that was erected directly beneath the service drop and had been used to install new Dupont Tyvek HomeWrap to that side of the residence.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): An employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Location: Jobsite;  On or about 07/01/2025, employees were exposed to a fall of greater than 10-feet above the ground while performing siding work from a pump jack scaffold that was erected without a complete guardrail system or fall protection system to protect them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $3972.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  Location: Job site;  On or about 07/01/2025, employees were allowed to perform siding work from the lower roof of the residence approximately 7-feet above the next lower level without any form of fall protection, such as guardrails, safety nets, or alternative protective measures.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $3972
  • — I (S) $1986
  • — Z (S) $3972

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348346289.