Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

BAYTOWN, TX —

OSHA Inspection: EFX INDUSTRIAL, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of EFX INDUSTRIAL, LLC in 10328 INTERSTATE 10 SERVICE ROAD, BAYTOWN, TX 77521 (NAICS 424690). OSHA activity number 348346461.

Watch EFX Industrial, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EFX Industrial, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
EFX INDUSTRIAL, LLC
Site address
10328 INTERSTATE 10 SERVICE ROAD
City
BAYTOWN
State
TX
ZIP
77521
Mailing
7511 MILLER ROAD 2, HOUSTON, TX 77049

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
424690
Employees
158
Ownership type
A

Citations

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 H03 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $10641.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(iii): Contract employer did not document that each contract employee received and understood the training required by this paragraph to include a record which contained the identity of the contract employee, date of the training, and means used to verify understanding of the training.    On or about June 24 2025, in the Raven facility, the training records/certification of contract employees performing the line break activities at vessel 307B were not documented by the contract employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10641

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $14895.00 · Current $8937.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:  On or about June 24, 2025, in the Raven Butene-1 chemical manufacturing facility in Baytown, Texas,  employees that opened flanges and removed pipe spools at Vessel 307B were not in Tyvek suits and face shields.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8937
  • — Z (S) $14895

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $14895.00 · Current $14895.00

General-duty citation text

1910.1200(g)(8)    The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  On or about June 24, 2025, in the Raven Butene-1 chemical manufacturing facility, the SDS for Spent Catalyst was not readily accessible to employees that were working on Vessel 307B in the event of residual product leakage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $14895
  • — Z (S) $14895

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.  On or about June 24, 2025, in the Raven Butene-1 facility, the contract employees were using 3M 6000 series full face respirators during the line break activities at vessel 307B without any respirator fit testing.    -
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 F02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $14895.00 · Current $8937.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

1910.147(f)(2)(i)  When outside servicing personnel were engaged in activities in a facility, the onsite employer and the outside employer did not inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures:  On or about June 24, 2025, in the Raven Butene-1 facility in Baytown, Texas, employees of EFX were not informed of the host employer lockout and tagout procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8937
  • — Z (S) $14895

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424690)

More inspections in TX

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348346461.