BAYTOWN, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: EFX INDUSTRIAL, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of EFX INDUSTRIAL, LLC in 10328 INTERSTATE 10 SERVICE ROAD, BAYTOWN, TX 77521 (NAICS 424690). OSHA activity number 348346461.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EFX INDUSTRIAL, LLC
- Site address
- 10328 INTERSTATE 10 SERVICE ROAD
- City
- BAYTOWN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77521
- Mailing
- 7511 MILLER ROAD 2, HOUSTON, TX 77049
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424690
- Employees
- 158
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 H03 III
- Issued
- Dec 11, 2025
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $10,641 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(iii): Contract employer did not document that each contract employee received and understood the training required by this paragraph to include a record which contained the identity of the contract employee, date of the training, and means used to verify understanding of the training. On or about June 24 2025, in the Raven facility, the training records/certification of contract employees performing the line break activities at vessel 307B were not documented by the contract employer.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $10641
1910.132 D01 I
- Issued
- Dec 11, 2025
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $14,895 · Current $8,937 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment: On or about June 24, 2025, in the Raven Butene-1 chemical manufacturing facility in Baytown, Texas, employees that opened flanges and removed pipe spools at Vessel 307B were not in Tyvek suits and face shields.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $8937
- · Z (S) $14895
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Dec 11, 2025
- Abate by
- May 1, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $14,895 · Current $14,895
General-duty citation text
1910.1200(g)(8) The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): On or about June 24, 2025, in the Raven Butene-1 chemical manufacturing facility, the SDS for Spent Catalyst was not readily accessible to employees that were working on Vessel 307B in the event of residual product leakage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $14895
- · Z (S) $14895
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 11, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter. On or about June 24, 2025, in the Raven Butene-1 facility, the contract employees were using 3M 6000 series full face respirators during the line break activities at vessel 307B without any respirator fit testing. -
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 F02 I
- Issued
- Dec 11, 2025
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $14,895 · Current $8,937 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1910.147(f)(2)(i) When outside servicing personnel were engaged in activities in a facility, the onsite employer and the outside employer did not inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures: On or about June 24, 2025, in the Raven Butene-1 facility in Baytown, Texas, employees of EFX were not informed of the host employer lockout and tagout procedures.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $8937
- · Z (S) $14895
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424690)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348346461.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.