HARTLAND, WI —
OSHA Inspection: C&E CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of C&E CONSTRUCTION in 1146 MARY HILL CIRCLE, HARTLAND, WI 53029 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348413006.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- C&E CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 1146 MARY HILL CIRCLE
- City
- HARTLAND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53029
- Mailing
- 2028 GIDEON AVE, ZION, IL 60099
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $2,128
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). (a) On or about August 1, 2025, the employer had not ensured frequent and regular inspections of the job site were conducted by a competent person to ensure hazardous conditions were found and corrected. Hazards identified included fall hazards, eye hazards, and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2128
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns. (a) On or about August 1, 2025, employees were performing clean up on the ground and bringing roofing materials to the roof without a hard hat on while other employees were installing shingles on the roof above, exposing the employees head to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) On or about August 1, 2025, the employer did not ensure that eye protective equipment was used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). (a) On or about August 1, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees performing tear off of a two-story residential home roof were protected from falling to the ground below. This exposed the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4256
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. (a) On or about August 1, 2025, the employer had not ensured that employees performing roofing work had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. (a) On or about August 1, 2025, the employer did not ensure the extension ladder used by employees to access and egress the residential roof was extended at least three feet above the upper landing or secured to prevent displacement of the ladder, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
More inspections at C&E Construction
View C&E Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348413006.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.