SAINT LOUIS, MO —
OSHA Inspection: J.J MIRANDA CONSTRUCTION LLC
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of J.J MIRANDA CONSTRUCTION LLC in 2102 S. 11TH STREET, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63104 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 348419862.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J.J MIRANDA CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 2102 S. 11TH STREET
- City
- SAINT LOUIS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63104
- Mailing
- 9116 DELPHINE AVE, OVERLAND, MO 63114
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.152 A01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.152(a)(1): Containers other than approved metal safety cans or DOT approved containers were used for the handling and use of flammable liquids in quantities of 5 gallons or less: On or about 8/5/2025: The employer did not ensure gasoline, used in the gas-powered air compressor, was transported in an approved metal safety can or DOT-approved container to ensure employees were not exposed to chemical hazards and fire hazards during construction operations at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.451 B05 II
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end. On or about 8/5/2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees using a platform greater than 10 feet in length did not extend over its support more than 18 inches at the jobsite located at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard when performing masonry work, approximately thirty-six (36) feet above the ground, from the end of a platform that extended over its support approximately seven (7) feet. The platform was not installed with a fall protection system, and it was not designed or installed in a way that allows the cantilevered portion to support employees without tipping.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 C02 I
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement: On or about 8/5/2025, the employer failed to ensure that the ladder jack scaffold's footings were level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement at the jobsite located at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard when performing masonry work approximately thirty-six (36) feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. On or about 7/5/2025 at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO, the employer did not provide adequate means of access to a ladder jack scaffold at the job site. Employees were observed ascending and descending from the ladders that supported the scaffold platform and then climbing onto the platform, that was over thirty-one (31) feet high, by directly climbing over on the outside of the platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: On or about 7/5/2025 at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO, the employer did not protect employees from falling to a lower level, by utilizing fall protection, when they were tuckpointing from a ladder jack scaffold at approximately thirty-one (31) feet above a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.452 K01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m). On or about 8/5/2025, at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO, the employer failed to protect employees from fall or tipping hazards, when they were tuckpointing from a ladder jack scaffold. The platform the employees were working on was approximately thirty-one (31) feet above a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.452 K04
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(4): Ladders used to support ladder jacks were not placed, fastened, or equipped with devices to prevent slipping: On or about 8/5/2025, the employer failed to ensure that the ladder jack scaffold's ladders were placed, fastened, or equipped with devices to prevent slipping at the jobsite located at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard when performing masonry work approximately thirty-six (36) feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.1053 B08
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder. On or about 8/5/2025, the employer failed to ensure that ladders used for a ladder jack scaffold were placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic and were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder jobsite located at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO. Employees were exposed to fall hazards while doing masonry work approximately thirty-six (36) feet above the ground from a ladder jack scaffold. The ladders supporting the scaffold were placed in the middle of a walkway and not secured or barricaded to keep traffic away from the base of the ladders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and bottom of ladders was not kept clear: On or about 8/5/2025, the employer did not ensure the area around the bottom of the ladder was kept clear of debris at the job site located at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO. The employees were exposed to trip and fall hazards when using the ladder to ascend and descend form the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired. On or about 8/5/2025, the employer failed to ensure that portable ladders with structural defects were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired at the jobsite located at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO. Employees were working from approximately thirty-six (36) feet above the ground on a ladder jack scaffold that was constructed withe a ladder that had missing cleats and damaged rungs.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. On or about 8/5/2025, employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards at the jobsite located at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO. The employees were tuckpointing from a ladder jack scaffold at approximately thirty-one (31) feet above a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2025
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. On or about 8/5/2025, the employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work at the jobsite located at 2402 S. 11th Street in St. Louis, MO. The employees were tuckpointing from a ladder jack scaffold at approximately thirty-one (31) feet above a lower level. The employees erected the scaffold before working form it.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348419862.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.