JAMESTOWN, OH —
OSHA Inspection: KEVIN HAYSLIP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KEVIN HAYSLIP in 3762 LAKESHORE DRIVE, JAMESTOWN, OH 45335 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348445834.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KEVIN HAYSLIP
- Site address
- 3762 LAKESHORE DRIVE
- City
- JAMESTOWN
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45335
- Mailing
- 2683 OLD U.S. 35, XENIA, OH 45385
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,412 · Current $2,412
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a) On or about August 18, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing work on a residential home were utilizing a personal fall arrest system, exposing employees to fall heights greater than 8 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2412
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2025
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. a) On or about August 18, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that each employee exposed to a fall hazard was trained on the hazards of falling and the procedures to minimize the hazards in the work area, resulting in employees being exposed to fall hazards greater than 8 feet while performing residential roofing work.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
More inspections at Kevin Hayslip
View Kevin Hayslip's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348445834.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.