Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: HOWMET AEROSPACE INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. in 1000 WARREN ROAD, NILES, OH 44446 (NAICS 336412). OSHA activity number 348451717.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Howmet Aerospace INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Howmet Aerospace INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1000 WARREN ROAD
City
NILES
State
OH
ZIP
44446
Mailing
1000 WARREN ROAD, NILES, OH 44446
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336412
Employees
542
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 25, 2025
Penalty
Initial $13,240 · Current $13,240
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.  (a)	On or about August 20, 2025, the employer did not ensure effective machine guarding was provided for the KATSO #1 Bandsaw, exposing employees to serious hazards such as crush injuries and entanglement with moving parts, particularly the sliding saw assembly. The existing interlock systems intended to secure the gates in the operators' station, and the side perimeter stairs were ineffective. This design flaw allowed operators to step onto the operating platform and into the danger area while the machine was operational, significantly increasing the risk of workplace injuries.  (b)	On or about August 20, 2025, the employer did not ensure effective machine guarding was provided for the KATSO #2 Bandsaw, exposing employees to serious hazards such as crush injuries and entanglement with moving parts, particularly the sliding saw assembly. The operator's station lacked a gate on the platform side which rendered the interlock system ineffective. This design flaw allowed operators to step onto the operating platform and into the danger area while the machine was operational, significantly increasing the risk of workplace injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $13240
  • · Z (S) $13240

View Howmet Aerospace INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348451717.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.