EATONTON, GA —
OSHA Inspection: INDUSTRIAL FABRICATING CONTRACTORS, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of INDUSTRIAL FABRICATING CONTRACTORS, LLC in 603 C OAK ST, EATONTON, GA 31024 (NAICS 331210). OSHA activity number 348458357.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INDUSTRIAL FABRICATING CONTRACTORS, LLC
- Site address
- 603 C OAK ST
- City
- EATONTON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31024
- Mailing
- 248 E RIVERBEND DR, EATONTON, GA 31024
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331210
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,412 · Current $1,447 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): a) On or about August 21, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards ranging from approximately 8 to 15 feet to the lower level, in that an adequate fall protection system such as guardrails, safety nets, or personal fall arrest systems was not provided while they were engaged in metal work activities on large metallic ventilation structures. b) On or about August 21, 2025, employees were exposed to fall hazards ranging from approximately 8 to 15 feet to the lower level, in that an adequate fall protection system such as guardrails, safety nets, or personal fall arrest systems was not provided to employees engaged in metal work activities while working from a scissor lift, and using the top guardrail to step onto the top of the large metallic ventilation structures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1447.2
- — Z (S) $2412
1910.106 A32
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $1,702 · Current $1,021 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(a)(32): The employer did not ensure that flammable liquids were stored in a container that complies with paragraph (d)(2) of this section. a) On or about August 21, 2025, the employer exposed employees to combustion and fire hazards, in that flammable chemicals were not kept in a flammable cabinet to prevent accidental ignition due to sparks, while employees were nearby engaged in metal work activities on large metallic ventilation structures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1021.2
- — Z (S) $1702
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $1,702 · Current $1,021 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) On or about August 21, 2025, employees were exposed to eye injury and vision loss, in that an eye wash station was not provided nearby the workstation of employees using corrosive chemicals during metal work activities on large ventilation structures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1021.2
- — Z (S) $1702
1910.178 L01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $1,362 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that each power industrial truck operator was competent to operate a power industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (1): a) On or about August 21, 2025, the employer exposed employees engaged in metal work activities to struck-by hazards, in that powered industrial truck (forklift) operators had not received the required training or certification to safely operate the equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1362
- — Z (S) $2270
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $2,412 · Current $1,447 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about August 21, 2025, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards, in that the Hyd-Mech band saw was not guarded to protect employees from ingoing nip points and rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1447.2
- — Z (S) $2412
1910.243 C01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1): Abrasive wheel(s) were used on portable grinder(s) which were not provided with safety guard(s) meeting the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1) through (c)(4)(a): a) On or about August 21, 2025, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards, in that the portable grinders were not guarded to protect employees from ingoing nip points and rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). a) On or about August 21, 2025, the employer did not perform a workplace hazard assessment to determine if hazards were present or likely to be present that would require the use of personal protective equipment for employees working with chemicals such as propane, xylene, and paint thinner at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) On or about August 21, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not inform or train employees on the hazards related to propane, xylene, and paint thinner when engaged in metal work activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331210)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348458357.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.