Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MJR MARKETING LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MJR MARKETING LLC in 17515 ENGLE LAKE DR SUITE 201, MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130 (NAICS 423910). OSHA activity number 348466517.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MJR Marketing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MJR Marketing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MJR MARKETING LLC
Site address
17515 ENGLE LAKE DR SUITE 201
City
MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS
State
OH
ZIP
44130
Mailing
17515 ENGLE LAKE DR SUITE 201, MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423910
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2025
Abate by
Nov 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $1,986 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that all places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces are kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition.  (a)	On or about August 27, 2025, the employer did not maintain passageways, storerooms, and walking-working surfaces in a clean and orderly condition. Specifically, J-Room located in the front office area. Empty boxes, pallets, and products clutter the aisleways between the storage racks and the passageways, creating walking-working surfaces of less than 12 inches, exposing employees to tripping hazards while performing their order-building tasks.  (b)	On or about August 27, 2025, the employer did not maintain passageways, storerooms, and walking-working surfaces in a clean and orderly condition. Specifically, Aisles D, E, F, and G located in the main warehouse. Pallets of products are positioned in the aisleways between the storage racks, creating a walking-working surface of less than 24 inches, exposing employees to tripping hazards while performing their order-building tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1986
  • — Z (S) $3972

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2025
Abate by
Nov 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(c): The employer did not provide, and ensure each employee uses, a safe means of access and egress to and from walking-working surfaces.  (a)	On or about August 27, 2025, the employer did not provide or ensure a safe means of access and egress for employees building orders in J-Room. Specifically, the aisleways between the storage racks and passageways were cluttered with empty boxes, pallets, and products, which created walking-working surfaces measuring less than 12 inches. As a consequence, access and egress were obstructed, exposing employees to tripping hazards while performing their order-building tasks.  (b)	On or about August 27, 2025, the employer did not provide or ensure a safe means of access and egress for employees building orders in the main warehouse. Specifically, in aisles D, E, F, and G, pallets of products were positioned in the aisleways between the storage racks, creating walking-working surfaces that measured less than 24 inches. As a consequence, access and egress were obstructed, exposing employees to tripping hazards while performing their order-building tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.23 B08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2025
Abate by
Nov 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $1,986 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(8): The employer did not ensure that ladders are used only for the purposes for which they were designed.  On or about August 27, 2025, the employer did not ensure that step ladders were used for their intended purposes. Specifically, stepladders were used as single or straight ladders in the closed position, without the metal spreader in the open position, to access and retrieve products from storage racks that ranged from 8 to 9 feet in height, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1986
  • — Z (S) $3972

1910.30 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2025
Abate by
Nov 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.30(b)(1): The employer did not train each employee on or before May 17, 2017 in the proper care, inspection, storage, and use of equipment covered by this subpart before an employee uses the equipment.  On or about August 27, 2025, the employer did not provide the required training to each employee regarding the proper care, inspection, storage, and use of ladders before allowing them to utilize this equipment. Specifically, employees utilized several ladders including the Werner 6006 Fiberglass 6 ft step ladder, the Werner 6208 Fiberglass 8 ft step ladder, the Uline 7-step mobile ladder stand, and the Uline 8-step mobile ladder stand to access products positioned on storage racks with heights ranging from 8 to 9 feet. Employees utilized step ladders as single or straight ladders in the closed position, without the metal spreader opened, when access storage shelves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2025
Abate by
Nov 18, 2025
Penalty
Initial $5,296 · Current $2,648 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  On or about August 27, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees operating the Toyota 8FBE15U Electric Powered Industrial Truck (Forklift) were adequately trained and evaluated for their competency in safely operating Powered Industrial Trucks prior to their operation.  As a result, employees were exposed to stuck-by hazards, including increased risks of accidents from improper operating techniques, potential collisions, and the danger of tipping over or losing control of the powered industrial truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2648
  • — Z (S) $5296

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348466517.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.