Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MT. HOLLY POWDER COATING LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MT. HOLLY POWDER COATING LLC in 10 LIPPINCOTT LANE, MOUNT HOLLY, NJ 08060 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 348469941.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MT. Holly Powder Coating LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MT. Holly Powder Coating LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10 LIPPINCOTT LANE
City
MOUNT HOLLY
State
NJ
ZIP
08060
Mailing
10 LIPPINCOTT LANE, MOUNT HOLLY, NJ 08060
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,128 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) Throughout the facility: The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear 3M Rugged Comfort 6500 elastomeric half face respirators, on or about 8/28/25.  NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2128

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Throughout the facility: The employer did not provide medical evaluation to employees required to wear 3M Rugged Comfort 6500 elastomeric half face respirators prior to use, on or about 8/28/25.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k):The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  a) Throughout the facility: On or about 8/28/25, the employer did not ensure employees who were required to wear 3M Rugged Comfort 6500 elastomeric half face respirators were provided comprehensive, understandable training annually.  NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,837 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a) Throughout the facility: Employees who operated the Yale propane forklift (Model GLFC50RDUAE080 Serial Number 43-6002) and Yale propane forklift (Model GLC040AAJUAT083 Serial number P318110) were not trained per the requirements of the standard, on or about 8/28/25
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2837

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $2,130 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met:  a) Throughout the facility: Th e employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for chemicals used by employees such as but not limited to Benco B17 and Benco B15 solvent (corrosive), GP lacquer Thinner, and wax and grease remover. On or about 8/28/25.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2130
  • — Z (S) $3547

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Throughout the facility: Employees were not trained in the hazards of chemicals they used including but not limited to Benco B17 and Benco B15 solvent (corrosive), GP lacquer Thinner, and wax and grease remover. On or about 8/28/25.  NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1052 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2026
Abate by
Mar 16, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR  1910.1052(l)(1):The employer did not provide information and training for each affected employee prior to or at the time of initial assignment to a job involving potential exposure to methylene chloride  a)Outside near the loading dock: The employer did not provide information and training to employees that use Benco 17 and Benco 15 stripper which contains 55-65% methylene chloride on the hazards associated with it, on or about 8/28/25.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1052 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 18, 2026
Abate by
Mar 16, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $2,130 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1730

29 CFR  1910.1052(d)(1)(i):Where methylene chloride was present in the workplace, the employer did not determine each employee's exposure:  a) Outside near the loading dock: The employer did not perform air sampling to determine employee exposure to methylene chlorine. Employees use Benco 17 and Benco 15 stripper (corrosive) which contains 55-65% methylene chloride to strip items that were previously powder coated. On or about 8/28/25.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2130
  • — Z (S) $3547

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348469941.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.