MOUNT HOLLY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: MT. HOLLY POWDER COATING LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MT. HOLLY POWDER COATING LLC in 10 LIPPINCOTT LANE, MOUNT HOLLY, NJ 08060 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 348469941.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MT. HOLLY POWDER COATING LLC
- Site address
- 10 LIPPINCOTT LANE
- City
- MOUNT HOLLY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08060
- Mailing
- 10 LIPPINCOTT LANE, MOUNT HOLLY, NJ 08060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332812
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,128 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Throughout the facility: The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear 3M Rugged Comfort 6500 elastomeric half face respirators, on or about 8/28/25. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1470
- — Z (S) $2128
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Throughout the facility: The employer did not provide medical evaluation to employees required to wear 3M Rugged Comfort 6500 elastomeric half face respirators prior to use, on or about 8/28/25.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k):The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a) Throughout the facility: On or about 8/28/25, the employer did not ensure employees who were required to wear 3M Rugged Comfort 6500 elastomeric half face respirators were provided comprehensive, understandable training annually. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) Throughout the facility: Employees who operated the Yale propane forklift (Model GLFC50RDUAE080 Serial Number 43-6002) and Yale propane forklift (Model GLC040AAJUAT083 Serial number P318110) were not trained per the requirements of the standard, on or about 8/28/25
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1470
- — Z (S) $2837
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $2,130 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met: a) Throughout the facility: Th e employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for chemicals used by employees such as but not limited to Benco B17 and Benco B15 solvent (corrosive), GP lacquer Thinner, and wax and grease remover. On or about 8/28/25.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2130
- — Z (S) $3547
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Throughout the facility: Employees were not trained in the hazards of chemicals they used including but not limited to Benco B17 and Benco B15 solvent (corrosive), GP lacquer Thinner, and wax and grease remover. On or about 8/28/25. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1052 L01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(l)(1):The employer did not provide information and training for each affected employee prior to or at the time of initial assignment to a job involving potential exposure to methylene chloride a)Outside near the loading dock: The employer did not provide information and training to employees that use Benco 17 and Benco 15 stripper which contains 55-65% methylene chloride on the hazards associated with it, on or about 8/28/25.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1052 D01 I
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 16, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $2,130 Reduced
1730
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1052(d)(1)(i):Where methylene chloride was present in the workplace, the employer did not determine each employee's exposure: a) Outside near the loading dock: The employer did not perform air sampling to determine employee exposure to methylene chlorine. Employees use Benco 17 and Benco 15 stripper (corrosive) which contains 55-65% methylene chloride to strip items that were previously powder coated. On or about 8/28/25.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2130
- — Z (S) $3547
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332812)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348469941.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.