OSHA Inspection: CAPE CORAL RANGE AND STORE LLC

Issued

2026-02-23 00:00:00

Abate by

2026-04-09 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3547.00 · Current $2128.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a) at 1122 Del Prado Boulevard South Cape Coral, Florida, on or about August 28, 2025, an Assistant General Manager was exposed to noise dose levels at 225.3% of the allowable 8-hour TWA-Action Limit (85 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 225.3% is 91.2 dBA. The sampling was performed for 456 minutes during one shift on February 12, 2026.   b) at 1122 Del Prado Boulevard South Cape Coral, Florida, on or about August 28, 2025, a Range Safety Officer was exposed to noise dose levels at 285.5% of the allowable 8-hour TWA-Action Limit (85 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 285.5% is 92.9 dBA. The sampling was performed for 456 minutes during one shift on February 12, 2026.   c) at 1122 Del Prado Boulevard South Cape Coral, Florida, on or about August 28, 2025, a Range Safety Officer was exposed to noise dose levels at 176.9% of the allowable 8-hour TWA-Action Limit (85 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 176.9% is 94.5 dBA. The sampling was performed for 452 minutes during one shift on February 12, 2026.   d) at 1122 Del Prado Boulevard South Cape Coral, Florida, on or about August 28, 2025, a Range Safety Officer was exposed to noise dose levels at 192.8% of the allowable 8-hour TWA-Action Limit (85 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 192.8% is 95.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 455 minutes during one shift on February 12, 2026.

Issued

2026-02-23 00:00:00

Abate by

2026-04-09 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2128.00 · Current $1277.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) On or about August 28, 2025, at 1122 Del Prado Boulevard, the employer did not develop and implement a written worksite specific respiratory protection program for employees provided and required to use tight-fitting facepiece respirators.

Issued

2026-02-23 00:00:00

Abate by

2026-04-09 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) On or about August 28, 2025, at 1122 Del Prado Boulevard, the employer did not medically evaluate workers required to utilize thigh-fitting respiratory protection .

Issued

2026-02-23 00:00:00

Abate by

2026-04-09 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a) On or about August 28, 2025, the employer did not fit tested workers required to utilize thigh-fitting respiratory protection such as 3M Half Face.

Issued

2026-02-23 00:00:00

Abate by

2026-04-09 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):  a) On or about August 28, 2025, at 1122 Del Prado Boulevard, the employer did not provide information and training to workers required to utilize thigh-fitting respiratory protection.