Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TUPELO REALTY, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of TUPELO REALTY, LLC in 500 WOOD STREET, BRISTOL, RI 02809 (NAICS 531311). OSHA activity number 348482399.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tupelo Realty, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tupelo Realty, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TUPELO REALTY, LLC
Site address
500 WOOD STREET
City
BRISTOL
State
RI
ZIP
02809
Mailing
99 TUPELO STREET, BRISTOL, RI 02809
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
531311
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2026
Abate by
Mar 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  a) Jobsite: On or about 9/4/2025, the employer did not implement engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection to limit employees exposure to crystalline silica while demolishing concrete utilizing jackhammers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2482.5
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1153 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2026
Abate by
Mar 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(2)(i): A means of exhaust was not provided to minimize the accumulation of visible airborne dust for tasks performed indoors or in enclosed areas.   a) Jobsite: On or about 9/4/2025, the employer did not provide a means of exhaust to limit employees exposure to crystalline silica while demolishing concrete utilizing jackhammers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2026
Abate by
Mar 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(f)(1): The employer allowed dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica and wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods were feasible.   a) Jobsite: On or about 9/4/2025, the employer did not ensure that employees used wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods for cleaning dry concrete dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2026
Abate by
Mar 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.  a) Jobsite: On or about 9/4/2025, the employer did not assess the exposure of employees to crystalline silica when employees were engaged in concrete mezzanine demolition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2482.5
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2026
Abate by
Mar 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan.   a) Jobsite: On or about 9/4/2025, the employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan when employees were tasked with utilizing jackhammers to demolish concrete off of a mezzanine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.5
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.1153 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2026
Abate by
Mar 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee is trained in accordance with the provisions of HCS and paragraph (i)(2) of this section.   a) Jobsite: On or about 9/4/2025, the employer did not provide hazard communication training to employees when they were tasked with utilizing jackhammers to demolish concrete off of a mezzanine, and reasonably expected to be exposed to crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.5
  • — Z (S) $3547

View Tupelo Realty, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348482399.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.