OSHA Inspection: NOA INIGUEZ

Issued

Feb 20, 2026

Abate by

Mar 6, 2026

Penalty

Initial $398 · Current $398

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  (a) Noa Iniguez DBA Graydale Roofing, failed to document abatement within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:  Citation 1, Item 1, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) with an abatement date of October 23, 2025.  Citation 1, Item 2, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) with an abatement date of October 23, 2025.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1), abatement certification and documentation of abatement is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).

Issued

Sep 26, 2025

Abate by

Oct 23, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a)  On or about September 4, 2025,  employees conducting roofing activities (shingle installation) on an 8:12 pitch roof of the structure were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of 9-feet 4-inches at the eave, and approximately 17-feet at the gabled ridge end.

Issued

Sep 26, 2025

Abate by

Oct 23, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) On or about September 4, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been properly trained to recognize, minimize, or eliminate the fall hazards associated with roofing work.

Issued

Sep 26, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access.  (a) On or about September 4, 2025, the portable ladder(s) being used by employees to access the roof of the structure  did not extend at least three feet above the upper point of contact with the eave, nor were ladders secured in place. This exposed employees accessing and egressing the roof to a fall hazard of 9-feet,  4-inches onto  concrete.