STRONGSVILLE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ACE RELOCATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ACE RELOCATION SYSTEMS, INC. in 14675 FOLTZ INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, STRONGSVILLE, OH 44149 (NAICS 484110). OSHA activity number 348488214.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ACE RELOCATION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Site address
- 14675 FOLTZ INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
- City
- STRONGSVILLE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44149
- Mailing
- 2312 OLD BASTROP HWY, SAN MARCOS, TX 78666
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 484110
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,809 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section 29 CFR 1910.28, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by one or more of the systems described in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): a) On or about July 9, 2025, the employer did not protect employees from a fall of approximately 6 feet while working on an elevated work platform, at or near loading dock 3. Employees utilized a harness, as a personal fall arrest system, while tied off to an inadequate guardrail system that was loose and unsecure at the base plate. b) On or about September 8, 2025, the employer did not protect employees from a fall of approximately 4 feet while working at or near loading dock 6. Forklifts and pedestrians transit the area which is not marked with a chain or other warning device when the dock is not in use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $6809
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,809 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: On or about September 8, 2025, the employer did not require the use of safety glasses or goggles when employees change out the liquified petroleum gas (LPG) cylinder on powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $6809
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,809 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: On or about September 8, 2025, the employer did not require hand protection to be worn by employees when changing out the liquified petroleum gas (LPG) cylinder on powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $6809
1910.140 C13 I
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $5,788 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.140(c)(13)(i): Anchorages were not capable of supporting at least 5000 pounds (22.2 kN) for each employee attached: On or about July 9, 2025, the employer permitted employees to use a homemade platform attachment in conjunction with the Caterpillar powered industrial truck (Model M2C400, S/N AT9040523) to work from elevations such as during dock repairs and used the guardrail as an anchorage point as part of the personal fall protection system. Bolts were missing from the base of the guardrail system and the guardrail swayed back and forth.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $5788
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $6,809 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: On or about July 9, 2025, the employer permitted employees to use a homemade platform attachment (97"L x 48.5"W) in conjunction with the Caterpillar powered industrial truck (Model M2C400, S/N AT9040523) to work from elevations such as during dock repairs. The employer did not obtain approval from the manufacturer to use this equipment which could affect the capacity and safe operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $6809
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2025
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: On or about September 8, 2025, the employer permitted employees to use a homemade platform attachment (97"L x 48.5"W) in conjunction with the Caterpillar powered industrial truck (Model M2C400, S/N AT9040523) to work from elevations such as during dock repairs. The employer did not request an updated data plate from the manufacturer to use this equipment which could affect the capacity and safe operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $4,341 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): On or about September 8, 2025, the Raymond high-capacity reach truck (GLB0361, M2501812513B) was in need of repair and was not taken out of service. The lift truck was available for use and had the key in the ignition.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $4341
More inspections at ACE Relocation Systems, INC.
View ACE Relocation Systems, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 484110)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348488214.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.