OSHA Inspection: LEONARDO DAVID SHUGULI CURILLO DBA DAVID CURILLO

Issued

Jan 26, 2026

Abate by

Feb 20, 2026

Penalty

Initial $319 · Current $319

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  (a) Leonardo David Shuguli Curillo DBA David Curillo failed to document abatement within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected.  Citation 1, Item 4 a Serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) with an abatement date of October 17, 2025.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).

Issued

Sep 23, 2025

Penalty

Initial $2,838 · Current $2,838

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.  (a) On or about September 9, 2025, at 10523 S. Rosemont Lane, Oak Creek, WI 53154, the employer did not ensure the employees assisting in roofing operations (ground worker) were protected from potential falling objects from above by the use of a protective helmet. This exposed the employees to a struck-by hazard from a height of up to approximately 18 feet 9 inches.

Issued

Sep 23, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  (a) On or about September 9, 2025, at 10523 S. Rosemont Lane, Oak Creek, WI 53154, employees installing a roof on a residential home roof with a 10:12 pitch were not using fall protection. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet 9 inches from the roof eve to the ground below on the front side of the home.

Issued

Sep 23, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.  (a) On or about September 9, 2025, at 10523 S. Rosemont Lane, Oak Creek, WI 53154, an employee conducting roofing activities on a 10:12 pitch roof was not properly protected from falling to the lower level. The attachment point of the body harness was front and centered at the waist (belt area) and not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head as required. This exposed the employees to severe spinal and neck injuries.

Issued

Sep 23, 2025

Abate by

Oct 17, 2025

Penalty

Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  (a) On or about September 9, 2025, at 10523 S. Rosemont Lane, Oak Creek, WI 53154, the employer did not ensure that all employees that were installing a roof were trained to recognize fall hazards and how to implement fall protection methods, exposing employees to fall hazards.