Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MKC CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MKC CONSTRUCTION LLC in 1303 WATER STREET, CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI 54729 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348509167.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MKC Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MKC Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1303 WATER STREET
City
CHIPPEWA FALLS
State
WI
ZIP
54729
Mailing
6736 COLFAX AVE N, BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Abate by
Mar 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $1,447 · Current $1,013 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  (a) Residential roof, various locations; On or about September 16, 2025, workers were operating pneumatic nail guns without the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1012.9
  • — Z (S) $1447

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Abate by
Mar 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $2,780 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   (a) Residential roof, various locations; On or about September 16, 2025, one or more methods of fall protection was not in place while employees performed roofing activities at heights ranging between approximately 9-feet, 4-inches to 20-feet, 6-inches above ground level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2780.4
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Abate by
Mar 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system:  (a) Residential roof, various locations; On or about September 16, 2025, roofing employees were permitted to use waist level attachment points at the front/side of body belts (climber style harnesses) as part of their personal fall arrest systems during roofing activities at heights ranging between approximately 9-feet, 4-inches to 20-feet, 6-inches above ground level.  Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (Sec. 1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a positioning device system for vertical surfaces, such as working on a wall, is regulated under Sec. 1926.502(e).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Abate by
Mar 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  (a) Residential roof, various locations; On or about September 16, 2025, the employer did not provide a written certification record of fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Abate by
Mar 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $1,929 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  (a) Residential house, southwest backside; On or about September 16, 2025, an aluminum extension ladder was leaned against the siding and was used for rooftop access/egress where the landing surface was approximately 9-feet, 4-inches above ground-level. The upper side rails of the ladder did not extend at least 3-feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1350.3
  • — Z (S) $1929

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Abate by
Mar 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):  (a) Residential house, southwest backside; On or about September 16, 2025, an aluminum extension ladder used to access and egress the roof was set with its foot approximately 9-feet from the house and its top support approximately 10-feet high, giving a horizontal set-back greater than approximately one-quarter of the ladder's working length.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348509167.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.