SPRINGFIELD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: JDC CONTRACTORS INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JDC CONTRACTORS INC. in 3941 PINTAIL DR & 3930 WOOD DUCK DR, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62711 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348515172.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JDC CONTRACTORS INC.
- Site address
- 3941 PINTAIL DR & 3930 WOOD DUCK DR
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62711
- Mailing
- 813 E GROVE AVE, RANTOUL, IL 61866
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): On or about September 19, 2025, employees performing roofing operations were exposed to eye injuries and fall and overhead hazards and the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the jobsite for unsafe activities and take necessary steps to eliminate and control the hazards: a. Employees on the roof were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet without fall protection. b. Employees working on the ground beneath employees on the roof performing roofing activities were exposed to overhead hazards without head protection. c. Employees on the roof were were exposed to eye injuries while using pneumatic nail guns without eye protection. d. Employees using portable ladders were exposed to fall hazards because the ladders did not extend three feet over the roof edge.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2483
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: On or about September 19, 2025, employees working on the ground below roofing operations were exposed to overhead hazards and the employer did not ensure hardhats were used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: On or about September 19, 2025, an employee performing roofing operations was exposed to eye injuries while using pneumatic nail guns and the employer did not ensure safety glasses were used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,483 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: On or about September 19, 2025, employees performing roofing operations were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet and the employer did not ensure fall protection was used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2482.5
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about September 19, 2025, employees performing roofing operations were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet and the employer did not ensure the employees were trained in the fall protection system to be used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: On or about September 19, 2025, employees using portable ladders to access the roof were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not ensure the ladders' side rails extended at least three feet above the roof's eave: a. The multi-position ladder used to access the South-facing side of 3941 Pintail Drive extended approximately 1.5 feet above the roof's edge. b. The multi-position ladder used to access the North-facing side of 3941 Pintail Drive extended approximately 1 foot above the roof's edge. c. The extension ladder used to access the North-facing side of 3930 Wood Duck Drive extended approximately 2 feet above the roof's edge.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1773.5
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: On or about September 19, 2025, employees using portable ladders to access the roof were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not ensure employees were trained to safely set up and use the ladders provided to complete the work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at JDC Contractors INC.
View JDC Contractors INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348515172.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.