Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNIFLYTE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of UNIFLYTE, INC. in 1600 12TH AVENUE, ORION, IL 61273 (NAICS 423510). OSHA activity number 348527698.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Uniflyte, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Uniflyte, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
UNIFLYTE, INC.
Site address
1600 12TH AVENUE
City
ORION
State
IL
ZIP
61273
Mailing
PO BOX 249, ORION, IL 61274
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423510
Employees
44
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2026
Abate by
Apr 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $12,769 · Current $8,938 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A): The energy control procedures did not contain a specific statement on the intended use of the procedure.  On or about September 25, 2025, an employee was exposed to ingoing nip points while performing servicing and maintenance on the flight machine because the procedures did not contain a specific statement on the intended use of the procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8938
  • — Z (S) $12769

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2026
Abate by
Apr 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:  On or about September 25, 2025, an employee was exposed to ingoing nip points while performing service and maintenance activities, because the procedures for flight machines did not clearly identify how to shut down and isolate the energy sources.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2026
Abate by
Apr 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them:  On or about September 25, 2025, an employee was exposed to ingoing nip points while performing service and maintenance activities, because the procedures for flight machine did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2026
Abate by
Apr 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control:  On or about September 25, 2025, an employee was exposed to ingoing nip points while performing servicing and maintenance activities, because the procedure for the flight machine did not clearly outline how to verify the effectiveness of the lockout.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2026
Abate by
Apr 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $12,769 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:  On September 25, 2025, the employer did not conduct periodic inspection of the lockout procedures to ensure that they were adequate, and that energy control steps were followed prior to starting servicing and maintenance tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12769

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2026
Abate by
May 11, 2026
Penalty
Initial $12,769 · Current $8,938 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee had not received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:  On or about September 25, 2025, an employee conducting a change over on the flight machine had not received authorized training, and the employer had not ensure that each employee engaged in servicing and maintenance task were trained as lockout authorized employee to safely de-energize machine or equipment prior to starting work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8938
  • — Z (S) $12769

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2026
Abate by
May 11, 2026
Penalty
Initial $12,769 · Current $8,938 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):  Employees who performed servicing and maintenance were not required to:  (1)	Know the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards of the energy to be controlled, and the method or means to control the energy,  (2)	Turn off and shut down the machine,  (3)	Physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source,  (4)	Affix lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating device,  (5)	Prior to starting work on machines that have been locked out or tagged out, verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished.  (6)	Prior to starting work on machines that have been locked out or tagged out, verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished.   On or about September 25, 2025, an employee was exposed to ingoing nip points while performing servicing and maintenance activities on the flight machine because the employer did not cover the actions listed above and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8938
  • — Z (S) $12769

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2026
Abate by
Jul 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $12,769 · Current $8,939 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  On or about September 25, 2025, employees operating the balancer were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards because effective machine guarding was not in place to protect operators from rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8939
  • — Z (S) $12769

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2026
Abate by
Feb 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $10,214 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    On or about September 25, 2025, an employee using a hoist crane in Cell 15, was exposed to electrical hazards because the extension cords were daisy chained and not in accordance with the listing, labeling, or certification instructions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $10214

View Uniflyte, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348527698.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.