Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL OROCIO, JR LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of MIGUEL OROCIO, JR LLC in 6719 N 59TH LN, MCALLEN, TX 78501 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 348542754.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Miguel Orocio, JR LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Miguel Orocio, JR LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6719 N 59TH LN
City
MCALLEN
State
TX
ZIP
78501
Mailing
907 PLENA VISTA CIR, ALAMO, TX 78516
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2026
Abate by
Apr 10, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about September 23, 2025, and times prior thereto, at this new residential construction site, employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing work at elevated heights and had not received adequate training to recognize and avoid unsafe conditions.  Instance (a): Employee was using a portable A-frame ladder improperly, including using the ladder as a means of access to an elevated platform while running electrical wiring. Instance (b): Employee worked from an elevated work platform that was less than 18 inches in width while running electrical wiring.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $4965
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.50 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2026
Abate by
Apr 16, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.50(b): Provisions were not made prior to commencement of the project for prompt medical attention in case of serious injury:  On or about September 23, 2025, and times prior thereto, at this new residential construction site, the employer did not ensure that provisions were made for prompt medical attention. An employee sustained injuries after falling from an elevated height, and emergency medical services were not contacted for approximately one hour to one hour and fifteen minutes following the incident, exposing employees to delayed medical treatment in the event of serious injury.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $4965
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:  On or about September 23, 2025, and at times prior thereto, at the interior of a new residential construction site, the employer failed to ensure that each employee was provided a working surface at least 18 inches in width,  and used a 2x4 door frame header as a work platform to run electrical wiring.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $4965
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2026
Penalty
Initial $11,585 · Current $11,585
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  On or about September 23, 2025, and at times prior thereto, at the interior of a new residential construction site, the employer failed to ensure that an employee was protected from falling to a lower level of approximately 8 feet, in that the employee stood on a narrow 2x4 door frame header to perform electrical work.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $11585
  • — Z (S) $11585

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Because of the portable ladder's length, the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access and the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid structure:   On or about September 23, 2025, and at times prior thereto, at the interior of a new residential construction site, the employer failed to ensure that ladders used to access the work location above the door frame extended three feet above the landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (S) $4965
  • — Z (S) $4965

1904.39 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
29 CFR  1904.39(a)(1): The employer did not report within 8-hours the death of an employee resulting from a work-related incident:   On or about October 2, 2025, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not report a work-related fatality within 8 hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — C (O) $5000
  • — Z (O) $5000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348542754.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.