UXBRIDGE, MA —
OSHA Inspection: J. P. G. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J. P. G. CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 93 CHESTNUT STREET, UXBRIDGE, MA 01569 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348549130.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J. P. G. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 93 CHESTNUT STREET
- City
- UXBRIDGE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01569
- Mailing
- 423 WEST CHESTNUT ST., BROCKTON, MA 02301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. A) Jobsite: On or about 10/10/2025, the employer did not ensure that the ground cleaning crew located directly under roofing activities were protected from falling objects by utilizing protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. A) Jobsite: On or about 10/10/2025, the employer did not ensure that employees utilized safety glasses for protection from flying particles while conducting roofing work.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). A) Jobsite: On or about 10/10/2025, the employer did not ensure that employees conducting roofing activities greater than 10-feet in height were provided and utilized fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder. A) Jobsite: On or about 10/10/2025, the employer did not ensure that the extension ladder used to access the roof was at an angle of about one-quarter of the working length.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348549130.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.