Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RABER PACKING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RABER PACKING COMPANY in 3000 WEST FARMINGTON ROAD, WEST PEORIA, IL 61604 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 348600040.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Raber Packing Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Raber Packing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3000 WEST FARMINGTON ROAD
City
WEST PEORIA
State
IL
ZIP
61604
Mailing
3000 WEST FARMINGTON ROAD, WEST PEORIA, IL 61604
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311612
Employees
65
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B11 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2026
Abate by
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,296 · Current $2,548 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(11)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers is equipped with stair rail systems and handrails as described in 29 CFR 1910.28 Table D-2-Stairway Handrail Requirements:  On or about November 17, 2025, employees using the north stairway to access the platform used to split and process slaughtered animals were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not ensure each open side of the stairway was equipped with a stair rail system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2548
  • — Z (S) $5296

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2026
Abate by
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $6,621 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  On or about November 17, 2025, an employee using corrosive chemicals such as, but not limited to, hard scald powder in the kill floor area was exposed to eye injuries and the employer did not provide an emergency eyewash station that met the requirements of the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3300
  • — Z (S) $6621

1910.212 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2026
Abate by
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $6,621 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(2): Guard(s) on machine(s) were not affixed to the machine or secured elsewhere when attachment to the machine was not possible:   On or about March 26, 2026, an employee operating the rollstock machine in the processing room was exposed to amputation hazards and the guard covering the package cutting blades was not affixed to the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3300
  • — Z (S) $6621

1910.303 F02

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2026
Abate by
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,296 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:   On or about November 17, 2025, an employee was exposed to electric shock and fire related injuries and the employer did not ensure circuit breakers in the electric panel labeled "Panel LF" were labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $5296

1910.333 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2026
Abate by
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,296 · Current $2,548 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.333(a)(2): Where exposed live parts were not deenergized (i.e., for reasons of increased or additional hazards or infeasibility), other safety-related work practices were not used to protect employees who could be exposed to the electrical hazards involved:   On or about November 17, 2025, an employee performing circuit testing on electrical equipment and fixtures located in the facility was exposed to electric shock hazards and the employer did not develop and use safety-related work practices when working on or near live electrical conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2548
  • — Z (S) $5296

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2026
Abate by
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $6,621 · Current $3,304 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   On or about November 17, 2025, employees worked with hazardous chemicals and the employer did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3304
  • — Z (S) $6621

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2026
Abate by
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   On or about November 17, 2025, employees worked with hazardous chemicals and the employer did not train the employees on the physical and health hazards of the chemicals and measures employees can take to protect themselves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2026
Abate by
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:   On or about November 17, 2025, employees worked with hazardous chemicals and the employer did certify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Raber Packing Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348600040.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.