ORLAND PARK, IL —
OSHA Inspection: MARIO GARCIA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARIO GARCIA in 9151-1961 SUTTON CT., ORLAND PARK, IL 60462 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348615675.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARIO GARCIA
- Site address
- 9151-1961 SUTTON CT.
- City
- ORLAND PARK
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60462
- Mailing
- 5329 S. TALMAN AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60632
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2026
- Abate by
- May 15, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a. On or about April 10, 2026, the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 01 004 03/11/2026
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $1,702 · Current $1,702
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee working on the ground, below roofing activities, was not wearing a hardhat to protect against falling materials and debris.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1702
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees using a pneumatic nail gun did not wear safety glasses, thereby exposing the employees to the hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees engaged in roofing activities were not protected from fall hazards while working at an elevation of approximately eight (8) feet seven (7) inches, above the ground, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards. b. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees engaged in roofing activities were not protected from fall hazards while working at an elevation of approximately seventeen (17) feet six (6) inches, above the ground, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3972
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2026
- Abate by
- Mar 11, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,838 · Current $2,838
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees conducting roofing operations were not provided training on how to minimize fall hazards, thereby exposing the employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2838
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $1,702 · Current $1,702
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1702
More inspections at Mario Garcia
View Mario Garcia's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348615675.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.