ORLAND PARK, IL —
OSHA Inspection: DANIEL MONTEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANIEL MONTEZ in 9121-9127 FAIRMONT CT., ORLAND PARK, IL 60462 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348617531.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DANIEL MONTEZ
- Site address
- 9121-9127 FAIRMONT CT.
- City
- ORLAND PARK
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60462
- Mailing
- 2310 S. DRAKE, CHICAGO, IL 60623
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- May 7, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a. On or about May 7, 2026 the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 02 001 04/03/2026
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees working below roofing activities were not wearing hard hats, thereby exposing the employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing activities, eight (8) feet four (4) inches above ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards. b. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing activities, eight (8) feet seven (7) inches above ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards. c. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing activities, seventeen (17) feet seven (7) inches above ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2026
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a. On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing activities had been provided fall protection training; however, the employer failed to verify the training by preparing a written certification of training record.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Daniel Montez
View Daniel Montez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348617531.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.