Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DANIEL MONTEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANIEL MONTEZ in 9121-9127 FAIRMONT CT., ORLAND PARK, IL 60462 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348617531.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Daniel Montez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daniel Montez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DANIEL MONTEZ
Site address
9121-9127 FAIRMONT CT.
City
ORLAND PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60462
Mailing
2310 S. DRAKE, CHICAGO, IL 60623
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2026
Abate by
Jun 11, 2026
Penalty
Initial $398 · Current $398
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.   a. On or about May 7, 2026 the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected:  Citation Number                                                Item Number                                    Abatement Date                 02                                                                       001                                                  04/03/2026
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  a.  On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees working below roofing activities were not wearing hard hats, thereby exposing the employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):  a.  On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing activities, eight (8) feet four (4) inches above ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.  b.  On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing activities, eight (8) feet seven (7) inches above ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.  c.  On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing activities, seventeen (17) feet seven (7) inches above ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Abate by
Apr 3, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a.  On or about November 26, 2025, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing roofing activities had been provided fall protection training; however, the employer failed to verify the training by preparing a written certification of training record.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Daniel Montez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348617531.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.