GREENWICH, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: MANUEL TENESACA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MANUEL TENESACA in 55 CROSS LANE, GREENWICH, CT 06830 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348619982.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANUEL TENESACA
- Site address
- 55 CROSS LANE
- City
- GREENWICH
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06830
- Mailing
- 38 OLD FARMS ROAD, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12603
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the employee replacing residential siding approximately 26 feet from ground level was protected from fall hazards by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $4965
1926.451 G02
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2): The employer did not have a competent person determine the feasibility and safety of providing fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds. Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that a competent person was designated to oversee the safe erection and use of the ladder-jack scaffold used by an employee to replace siding on a residential home. The scaffold platform was approximately 26 feet from ground level and no fall protection was given to the employee working from the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $4965
1926.452 K01
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Ladder -jack platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m). Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the working platform on a ladder-jack scaffold did not exceed 20 feet in height. An employee worked on a ladder-jack scaffold that measured approximately 26 feet from ground level.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $4965
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that an employee replacing siding on a residential home from a ladder-jack scaffold platform approximately 26 feet from ground level was trained to recognize the hazards of working without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $4965
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that an extension ladder used to access the working platform of a ladder-jack scaffold reached no less than two feet from the scaffold platform.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $4965
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Dec 22, 2025
- Abate by
- Jan 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees required to use ladders to install siding on a residential home were trained in the safe use of ladders prior to performing the work. This exposed the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $4965
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348619982.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.