Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MANUEL TENESACA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MANUEL TENESACA in 55 CROSS LANE, GREENWICH, CT 06830 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348619982.

Watch Manuel Tenesaca — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Manuel Tenesaca is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MANUEL TENESACA
Site address
55 CROSS LANE
City
GREENWICH
State
CT
ZIP
06830
Mailing
38 OLD FARMS ROAD, POUGHKEEPSIE, NY 12603
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $2400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the employee replacing residential siding approximately 26 feet from ground level was protected from fall hazards by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.451 G02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $2400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2): The employer did not have a competent person determine the feasibility and safety of providing fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds.  Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that a competent person was designated to oversee the safe erection and use of the ladder-jack scaffold used by an employee to replace siding on a residential home. The scaffold platform was approximately 26 feet from ground level and no fall protection was given to the employee working from the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.452 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $2400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Ladder -jack platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m).  Jobsite: On or about  October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the working platform on a ladder-jack scaffold did not exceed 20 feet in height. An employee worked on a ladder-jack scaffold that measured approximately 26 feet from ground level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $2400.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that an employee replacing siding on a residential home from a ladder-jack scaffold platform approximately 26 feet from ground level was trained to recognize the hazards of working without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $2400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.     Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that an extension ladder used to access the working platform of a ladder-jack scaffold reached no less than two feet from the scaffold platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $2400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  Jobsite: On or about October 23, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees required to use ladders to install siding on a residential home were trained in the safe use of ladders prior to performing the work. This exposed the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $4965

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348619982.