Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS ABRAHAM LOPEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS ABRAHAM LOPEZ in 5144 WATERBEND CT, MIDDLETOWN, OH 45044 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348621483.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Abraham Lopez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Abraham Lopez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS ABRAHAM LOPEZ
Site address
5144 WATERBEND CT
City
MIDDLETOWN
State
OH
ZIP
45044
Mailing
9903 GLASS CREEK CT, CINCINNATI, OH 45231
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  a) On or about December 1, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to a fall hazard were protected in that the portable ladder used for accessing the roof only extended 2 ft above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.20 B02

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2026
Penalty
Initial $9,930 · Current $9,930
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  a) On or about December 1, 2025, the employer did not conduct adequate inspections of the job site. Employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 13 feet in that conventional fall protection was not being worn while performing roofing work.   Luis Lopez was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1710810, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on February 26, 2024, with respect to a workplace located at 1465 Bloomwood Ln Milford, OH 45150.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $9930

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2026
Penalty
Initial $9,930 · Current $9,930
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a) On or before December 1, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing work on a residential structure were utilizing a fall protection system. Employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 13 ft.  Luis Lopez was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1710810, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on February 26, 2024, with respect to a workplace located at 1465 Bloomwood Ln Milford, OH 45150.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $9930

View Luis Abraham Lopez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348621483.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.