Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MEYER MACHINE & EQUIPMENT, INC DBA HARDY PRO-AIR SYSTEMS & SERVICE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MEYER MACHINE & EQUIPMENT, INC DBA HARDY PRO-AIR SYSTEMS & SERVICE in 351 MAIN STREET, ANTIOCH, IL 60002 (NAICS 333413). OSHA activity number 348631417.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Meyer Machine & Equipment, INC DBA Hardy Pro-Air Systems & Service — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Meyer Machine & Equipment, INC DBA Hardy Pro-Air Systems & Service is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
351 MAIN STREET
City
ANTIOCH
State
IL
ZIP
60002
Mailing
351 MAIN STREET, ANTIOCH, IL 60002
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333413
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L03 I M

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2026
Abate by
Apr 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,270 · Current $1,362 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3)(i)(M): The employer did not review the operating instructions, warnings, or precautions listed in the operator's manual for the types of vehicles that the employee operates:  a) Production Shop - On or about December 9, 2025, the employer did not review the operating instructions, warnings, or precautions listed in the operator's manual with employees that operate powered industrial vehicles, including the Toyota, Yale, and Nissan sit down forklifts.   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1362
  • — Z (S) $2270

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2026
Abate by
Apr 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not maintain certification that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l), containing information including the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:  a) Facility wide - On or about December 9, 2025, the employer did not maintain certification records for employees that operate powered industrial vehicles, including the Toyota, Yale, and Nissan sit down forklifts.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 O01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2026
Abate by
Apr 15, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,270 · Current $1,362 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(o)(1): Load(s) on powered industrial truck(s) were not stable or safely arranged:  a) Production Shop - On or about December 9, 2025, powered industrial trucks were used to move loads that were not stable or safely arranged.  The sit-down forklifts were used to lift the  chucks and material with the load suspended underneath the tines to load the chucks and material onto the Lathes.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1362
  • — Z (S) $2270

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2026
Penalty
Initial $1,929 · Current $1,157 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  a) Facility wide - On or about December 9, 2025, the employer did not remove powered industrial vehicles from service when damage or unsafe conditions were identified. The horns on the Nissan, Yale, and Toyota Sit Down Forklifts were not functioning.  No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1157.4
  • — Z (S) $1929

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2026
Abate by
Apr 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  a) Facility wide - On or about December 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure all powered industrial vehicles were inspected or examined, at least daily, prior to being placed in service. Forklifts, including the Nissan, Yale, and Toyota Sit Down Forklifts, were placed in service with conditions adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle, including the horns not functioning and malfunctioning lifting system on the Nissan sit down forklifts.   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 I09 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2026
Penalty
Initial $1,929 · Current $1,157 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(i)(9)(iii): Synthetic web sling(s) with snags, punctures, tears, or cuts were not immediately removed from service:  a) Production Shop - On or about December 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure all synthetic web slings were inspected for damage or defects prior to being placed in service. Synthetic web slings with frays and cuts were not removed from service and were used to lift material.  No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1157.4
  • — Z (S) $1929

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2026
Abate by
Apr 15, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,703 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) Production Shop - On or about December 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees were adequately protected from rotating parts and flying chips from equipment, such as the Monarch Machine Tool Co. Lathe, Yamazaki Machinery Works LTD. Lathe, and Kingston Lathe.   b) Production Shop - On or about December 9, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the guard was properly adjusted to cover all unused portions of the Marvel vertical band saw blade, such as the unused portion of the point of operation.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1702.8
  • — Z (S) $2838

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 9, 2026
Abate by
Apr 2, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted or located so that they were readily accessible without subjecting employees to injuries:  a)	Production Shop - On December 9, 2025, the fire extinguisher located along the main walkway, near the Shear and Welding Department, was not mounted or protected from damage. The fire extinguisher was on the floor near the vertical column.   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Meyer Machine & Equipment, INC DBA Hardy Pro-Air Systems & Service's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348631417.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.