Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SILVERIO JASSO

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SILVERIO JASSO in LOT #40, DACULA, GA 30019 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 348636788.

Watch Silverio Jasso — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Silverio Jasso is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SILVERIO JASSO
Site address
LOT #40
City
DACULA
State
GA
ZIP
30019
Mailing
3825 SCARSBOROUGH DRIVE NW, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30044
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a) New residential construction on Lot #40: On December 10, 2025, employees are exposed to struck-by hazards while performing masonry operations without eye protection in that the employer did not enforce the use of protective eyewear while engaged in brick cutting activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.300 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1926.300(b)(2): Moving part(s) of equipment exposed to contact by employees or which otherwise created a hazard, were not guarded:  a) New residential construction on Lot #40: On December 10, 2025, employees were exposed to amputation and severe laceration hazards. The abrasive cut-off saw used for cutting bricks had its lower blade guard rendered inoperable because it was tied back, preventing the guard from functioning as designed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  a) Supported scaffold: On 12/10/25, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of up to 15-feet in that no safe means of access/egress was provided to employees while entering or exiting the supported scaffold system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.   a) Lot #40: On 12/10/25, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 15-feet to the lower level from the supported scaffold system, in that no fall protection system was provided to employees using the scaffold engaged in masonry activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3547.00 · Current $3547.00
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.   a) On or about December 10, 2025, at the new residential construction site on Lot #40, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica hazards while dry cutting brick outdoors. The employer failed to implement the engineering controls required by Table 1, such as using a saw designed for wet cutting, resulting in exposure to silica dust and a respiratory health hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3547

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348636788.