PORT HUENEME, CA —
OSHA Inspection: BILLMANS COOL ROOFING COMPANY INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BILLMANS COOL ROOFING COMPANY INC. in CHANNEL ISLANDS AIR NATIONAL GUARD STATION 100 MULCAHEY DRIVE BLDG.801, PORT HUENEME, CA 93041 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348638420.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BILLMANS COOL ROOFING COMPANY INC.
- Site address
- CHANNEL ISLANDS AIR NATIONAL GUARD STATION 100 MULCAHEY DRIVE BLDG.801
- City
- PORT HUENEME
- State
- CA
- ZIP
- 93041
- Mailing
- PO BOX 47, LODI, CA 95241
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.150 C01 VI
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,502 · Current $4,502
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(vi): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 10B, was not provided within 50 feet of wherever more than 5 gallons of flammable or combustible liquids or 5 pounds of flammable gas were being used on the jobsite. Roof, bldg. 801: On or about December 10th, 2025, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure a fire extinguisher was provided for employee use. Employee(s) utilized multiple flammable spray adhesives to conduct roofing work. This condition potentially exposed employee(s) to fire hazard(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4502
- — Z (S) $4502
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $5,628 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity. Repair Hangar Bldg.801: On or about December 10th, 2025, and at times prior thereto, employee(s) were tasked to conduct roofing work. The employer did not ensure the scaffold, erected to a height of 65 feet, had been inspected for visible defects by a competent person prior to use. This condition potentially exposed employee(s) to fall, Struck-by and Crushing Hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5628
1926.502 D21
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service. Roof, bldg. 801: On or about December 10th, 2025, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) inspected Personal fall arrest system(s) prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components to include fall protection harness/equipment inspections record tags were left blank. This condition potentially exposed employee(s) to fall hazard(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.502 F02 II
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2)(ii): The rope, wire, or chain was not rigged or supported in such a way that its lowest point (including sag) was not less than 34 inches (0.9 m) from the walking/working surface and its highest point no more than 39 inches (1.0 m) from the walking/working surface. Roof, bldg. 801: On or about December 10th, 2025, and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of greater than 10 feet, in that, the warning line system was not maintained to prevent sagging below the minimum height of 34 inches from the walking/working surface. This condition potentially exposed employee(s) to fall hazard(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348638420.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.