Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J.C.L STUCCO LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of J.C.L STUCCO LLC in 1197 ALAFAYA TR, OVIEDO, FL 32765 (NAICS 238390). OSHA activity number 348670688.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J.C.L Stucco LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J.C.L Stucco LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
J.C.L STUCCO LLC
Site address
1197 ALAFAYA TR
City
OVIEDO
State
FL
ZIP
32765
Mailing
7786 PIPER CIRLCE, MILTON, FL 32583
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238390
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,419 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights  a.	On or about January 6, 2026, at the worksite: employees were exposed to a 13-foot fall hazard during waterproofing activities, in that, the scaffold was not fully planked.  b.	On or about January 6, 2026, at the worksite: employees were exposed to approximate 7-foot 6 inch fall hazard during waterproofing activities, in that, the scaffold was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1419
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,419 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Cross braces were used as a means of access.  a.	On or about January 6, 2026, at the worksite: the scaffold being used to install waterproofing materials did not have an access ladder, exposing employees to 13 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1419
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $1,702 · Current $851 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toe boards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.  a.	On or about January 6, 2026, at the worksite: employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that, they were not protected from falling objects through the installation of toe boards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $851
  • — Z (S) $1702

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,419 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest   a) On or about January 6, 2026, at the jobsite: an employee was exposed to an approximate 11-foot fall hazard while putting tape on joints, on a flat roof, in that, fall protection was not used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1419
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2026
Abate by
May 29, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a. On or about January 6, 2026, at the worksite: the employer did not provide written fall protection training certificates for employees exposed to an approximate 11 foot fall hazard while installing tape on joints, on a flat roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348670688.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.