CONVERSE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: HARBEY PEREZ PENAGOS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HARBEY PEREZ PENAGOS in 9402 DASSLER SPRINGS, CONVERSE, TX 78109 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 348675695.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HARBEY PEREZ PENAGOS
- Site address
- 9402 DASSLER SPRINGS
- City
- CONVERSE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78109
- Mailing
- 1203 CASTROVILLE RD, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78237
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,837 · Current $2,837
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: On or about January 6, 2026, employees were utilizing pneumatic nail guns to install roofing materials onto a newly constructed residential home without utilizing eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 29, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On or about January 6, 2026, employees were installing roofing materials onto the roof of a newly constructed residential home without utilizing fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4256
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348675695.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.