Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MK BEST REMODELING LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MK BEST REMODELING LLC in 448 HERKIMER STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11213 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 348677816.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MK Best Remodeling LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MK Best Remodeling LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
448 HERKIMER STREET
City
BROOKLYN
State
NY
ZIP
11213
Mailing
62 MANSFIELD AVENUE, ROOSEVELT, NY 11575
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2026
Abate by
May 21, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Location: a) On jobsite: Exterior wall of western side of the building:   On or about January 9, 2026, employees erected a pump?jack scaffolding system, which was used to install the siding on the western wall of the building. The scaffold was not erected by experienced and trained employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2026
Abate by
May 21, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  Location: a) On jobsite: Exterior wall of western side of the building:  On or about January 9, 2026, two employees were working on a pump?jack scaffold platform. The employees were not protected from falling to lower levels through the use of an appropriate fall protection system. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet to the ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2026
Abate by
May 21, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.  Location: a) On jobsite: Exterior wall of western side of the building:  On or about January 9, 2026, the employer did not ensure that a guardrail system was installed along all open sides and ends of the pump-jack scaffold platform used by employees performing siding installation. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet to the ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2026
Abate by
May 21, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  Location: a) On jobsite: Exterior wall of western side of the building:   On or about January 9, 2026, the employer did not provide training to employees who erected and worked from a pump-jack scaffold built with incomplete railings. Employees could not recognize hazards associated with the scaffold and were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet from the scaffold platform to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2026
Abate by
May 21, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   Location: a) On jobsite: the roof of the building:   On or about January 6, 2026, employees were performing roofing work without any form of fall protection. No guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system was provided or in use. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet from the roof to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2026
Abate by
May 21, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.   Location: a) On jobsite: Exterior wall of western side of the building  On or about January 9, 2026, employees used a extension ladder to access their work area. The ladder used did not extend 3 feet above the intended landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348677816.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.