OSHA Inspection: CAMERON MANUFACTURING & DESIGN - FLORIDA

Issued

May 29, 2026

Abate by

Jul 30, 2026

Penalty

Initial $10,641 · Current $6,385 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1026(d)(2)(i): The employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area:  a) On or about January 23, 2026, in the Welding department: employees were exposed to health hazards associated with Hexavalent Chromium, in that the employer failed to ensure that initial full shift monitoring was conducted for employees working with stainless steel metal.

Issued

May 29, 2026

Abate by

Jul 30, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1026(h)(1): A hazard was present or was likely to be present from skin or eye contact with chromium (VI); however, the employer did not provide appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment at no cost to employees, and/or did not ensure that employees used such clothing and equipment:  a) On or about January 23, 2026, in the Welding department: employees were exposed to health hazards associated with Hexavalent Chromium, in that, the employer did not ensure employees performing welding operations utilized PPE clothing properly when working with materials containing Hexavalent Chromium.

Issued

May 29, 2026

Abate by

Jul 30, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1026(h)(3)(iii): The employer did not inform any person who laundered or cleaned protective clothing or equipment contaminated with chromium (VI) of the potentially harmful effects of exposure to chromium (VI) and that the clothing and equipment should be laundered or cleaned in a manner that minimizes skin or eye contact with chromium (VI) and effectively prevents the release of airborne chromium (VI) in excess of the permissible exposure limit:  a) On or about January 23, 2026, in the Welding department: employees were exposed to health hazards associated with Hexavalent Chromium, in that, the employer failed to ensure to inform any person who laundered or cleaned protective clothing or equipment contaminated with chromium (VI) of the potentially harmful effects of exposure to chromium (VI) and that the clothing and equipment should be laundered or cleaned in a manner that minimizes skin or eye contact with chromium (VI) and effectively prevents the release of airborne chromium (VI).

Issued

May 29, 2026

Abate by

Jul 30, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $8,937

Hazardous substances 0689

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1026(i)(4)(ii): 29 CFR  1910.1026(i)(4)(ii): The employer did not ensure that the eating and drinking areas were maintained as free as practicable of chromium (VI), employees were allowed to consume food or beverages at a worksite where chromium (VI) was present:   a) On or about January 23, 2026, in the Welding department: employees were exposed to health hazard associated to Chromium VI, in that, the employer failed to ensure employees eating and drinking in an area where Chromium VI is present.

Issued

May 29, 2026

Abate by

Jul 30, 2026

Penalty

Initial $1,195 · Current $717 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1026(e)(1): The employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of chromium (VI) was, or could reasonably be expected to be, in excess of the permissible exposure limit:  a) On or about January 23, 2026, in the Welding department: employees were exposed to health hazards associated with Hexavalent Chromium, in that the employer failed to regulated areas wherever an employee's could be reasonably  exposed to Hexavalent Chromium working with stainless steel metals.