OSHA Inspection: ONE WAY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $16,550 · Current $16,550

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(b)(1)(i): The employer did not develop and/or implement a written safety and health program for its employees involved in hazardous waste operations:  (a) On or about January 08, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; employees involved in hazardous waste operations involving spent sulfuric acid worked without a developed and/or implemented written safety and health program.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $16,550 · Current $16,550

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations:  (a) On or about January 3, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; employees engaged in emergency response operations involving spent sulfuric acid without a developed emergency response plan prior to commencement of emergency response operations.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(q)(6)(iii): Employees who participated as hazardous materials technicians, or were expected to participate as hazardous materials technicians, had not received at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level, and in addition have competency in the areas outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I) and/or the employer did not so certify: Note:  This SAVEs may be grouped with 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6) as appropriate.  a) On or about January 3, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; employees who participated as hazardous materials technicians had not received at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level and competency in the areas outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (I), and/or were not properly certified by the employer.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $16,550 · Current $16,550

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) On or about January 9, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; employees required to use respirators while working with or around sulfuric acid worked without an established written respiratory protection program containing worksite-specific procedures

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $16,550 · Current $16,550

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) On or about January 9, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; employees working with or around spent sulfuric acid worked without a developed written hazard communication program describing how the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(e)(3)(i): General site workers engaged in hazardous substance removal or other activities which exposed or potentially exposed workers to hazardous substances and health hazards did not receive a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off the site, and a minimum of three days actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained experienced supervisor:  (a) On or about January 8, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #1 engaged in hazardous substance removal involving spent sulfuric acid without receiving a minimum of 40 hours of off-site instruction and a minimum of three days of actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained, experienced supervisor.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Jul 31, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(e)(3)(i): General site workers engaged in hazardous substance removal or other activities which exposed or potentially exposed workers to hazardous substances and health hazards did not receive a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off the site, and a minimum of three days actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained experienced supervisor:  (a) On or about January 16, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #2 engaged in hazardous substance removal involving spent sulfuric acid without receiving a minimum of 40 hours of off-site instruction and a minimum of three days of actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained, experienced supervisor.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(e)(3)(i): General site workers engaged in hazardous substance removal or other activities which exposed or potentially exposed workers to hazardous substances and health hazards did not receive a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off the site, and a minimum of three days actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained experienced supervisor:  (a) On or about January 9, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #3 engaged in hazardous substance removal involving sulfuric acid without receiving a minimum of 40 hours of off-site instruction and a minimum of three days of actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained, experienced supervisor.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(e)(3)(i): General site workers engaged in hazardous substance removal or other activities which exposed or potentially exposed workers to hazardous substances and health hazards did not receive a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off the site, and a minimum of three days actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained experienced supervisor:  (a) On or about January 12, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #4 engaged in hazardous substance removal involving sulfuric acid without receiving a minimum of 40 hours of off-site instruction and a minimum of three days of actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained, experienced supervisor.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(e)(3)(i): General site workers engaged in hazardous substance removal or other activities which exposed or potentially exposed workers to hazardous substances and health hazards did not receive a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off the site, and a minimum of three days actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained experienced supervisor:  (a) On or about January 12, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #5 engaged in hazardous substance removal involving sulfuric acid without receiving a minimum of 40 hours of off-site instruction and a minimum of three days of actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained, experienced supervisor.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(e)(3)(i): General site workers engaged in hazardous substance removal or other activities which exposed or potentially exposed workers to hazardous substances and health hazards did not receive a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off the site, and a minimum of three days actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained experienced supervisor:  (a) On or about January 11, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #6 engaged in hazardous substance removal involving sulfuric acid without receiving a minimum of 40 hours of off-site instruction and a minimum of three days of actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained, experienced supervisor.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(e)(3)(i): General site workers engaged in hazardous substance removal or other activities which exposed or potentially exposed workers to hazardous substances and health hazards did not receive a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off the site, and a minimum of three days actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained experienced supervisor:  (a) On or about January 8, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #7 engaged in hazardous substance removal involving sulfuric acid without receiving a minimum of 40 hours of off-site instruction and a minimum of three days of actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained, experienced supervisor.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(e)(3)(i): General site workers engaged in hazardous substance removal or other activities which exposed or potentially exposed workers to hazardous substances and health hazards did not receive a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off the site, and a minimum of three days actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained experienced supervisor:  (a) On or about January 8, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #8 engaged in hazardous substance removal involving sulfuric acid without receiving a minimum of 40 hours of off-site instruction and a minimum of three days of actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained, experienced supervisor.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.120(e)(3)(i): General site workers engaged in hazardous substance removal or other activities which exposed or potentially exposed workers to hazardous substances and health hazards did not receive a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off the site, and a minimum of three days actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained experienced supervisor:  (a) On or about January 9, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility, Employee #9 engaged in hazardous substance removal involving sulfuric acid without receiving a minimum of 40 hours of off-site instruction and a minimum of three days of actual field experience under the direct supervision of a trained, experienced supervisor.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about January 8, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #1 utilized a tight-fitting facepiece respirator without being fit tested prior to initial use while performing cleanup of a sulfuric acid spill.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about January 16, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #2 utilized a tight-fitting facepiece respirator without being fit tested prior to initial use while performing cleanup of a sulfuric acid spill.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about January 8, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #3 utilized a tight-fitting facepiece respirator without being fit tested prior to initial use while performing cleanup of a sulfuric acid spill.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about January 12, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #4 utilized a tight-fitting facepiece respirator without being fit tested prior to initial use while performing cleanup of a sulfuric acid spill.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about January 12, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #5 utilized a tight-fitting facepiece respirator without being fit tested prior to initial use while performing cleanup of a sulfuric acid spill.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about January 12, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #6 utilized a tight-fitting facepiece respirator without being fit tested prior to initial use while performing cleanup of a sulfuric acid spill.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about January 8, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #7 utilized a tight-fitting facepiece respirator without being fit tested prior to initial use while performing cleanup of a sulfuric acid spill.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about January 8, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #8 utilized a tight-fitting facepiece respirator without being fit tested prior to initial use while performing cleanup of a sulfuric acid spill.

Issued

Jun 26, 2026

Abate by

Aug 13, 2026

Penalty

Initial $165,514 · Current $165,514

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) On or about January 9, 2026, in multiple areas throughout the facility; Employee #9 utilized a tight-fitting facepiece respirator without being fit tested prior to initial use while performing cleanup of a sulfuric acid spill.