OSHA Inspection: BROTHERS DRYWALL AND REMODELING INC

Issued

Apr 22, 2026

Abate by

Jun 8, 2026

Penalty

Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.  (a) Worksite: On or about February 11, 2026, the employer required employees to use N-95 respirators while sanding drywall compound but did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite?specific procedures, including selection, medical evaluations, fit testing, training, proper use, cleaning, maintenance, and program evaluation.

Issued

Apr 22, 2026

Abate by

Jun 8, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazards to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability.  (a) Worksite: On or about February 11, 2026, the employer required employees to use N?95 respirators while sanding drywall compound but did not assess the respiratory hazards present or follow proper respirator selection procedures. The employer did not evaluate workplace conditions, airborne dust levels, or Assigned Protection Factors (APFs) to ensure the respirators provided were appropriate.

Issued

Apr 22, 2026

Abate by

Jun 8, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  (a) Worksite: On or about February 11, 2026, the employer required employees to use N?95 respirators while sanding drywall compound but did not provide the required medical evaluations to determine the employees' ability to safely wear a respirator. Employees were assigned respirators without completing the OSHA Respirator Medical Evaluation Questionnaire or receiving any medical assessment prior to use.

Issued

Apr 22, 2026

Abate by

Jun 8, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).  (a) Worksite: On or about February 11, 2026, the employer required employees to use N?95 respirators while sanding drywall compound but did not conduct the required initial or annual fit test to ensure an adequate face seal. Employees were assigned tight?fitting respirators without verification that the respirator properly fit the user.

Issued

Apr 22, 2026

Abate by

Jun 8, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training, which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary.  (a) Worksite: On or about February 11, 2026, the employer required employees to use N?95 respirators while sanding drywall compound but did not provide the required respirator training, to include proper use, limitations, donning and doffing, inspection, maintenance, and storage.

Issued

Apr 22, 2026

Abate by

Jun 8, 2026

Penalty

Initial $4,256 · Current $4,256

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii).   (a) Worksite: On or about February 11, 2026, the employer used ProForm Joint Compound at the worksite but did not develop or implement a written Hazard Communication Program with required site?specific procedures, including chemical inventory, labeling, SDS management, and employee training.

Issued

Apr 22, 2026

Abate by

Jun 8, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work areas.  (a) Worksite: On or about February 11, 2026, the employer used ProForm Joint Compound but did not maintain or provide the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the chemical, and employees did not have immediate access to SDSs during their work shift.

Issued

Apr 22, 2026

Abate by

Jun 8, 2026

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  (a) Worksite: On or about February 11, 2026, the employer did not provide employees with Hazard Communication training on the chemical hazards of ProForm Joint Compound, including dust?related health risks, SDS use, labeling, and protective measures required under 1910.1200(h).