Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ONE FAMILY EXTERIORS LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ONE FAMILY EXTERIORS LLC in 23 WASHINGTON STREET, CONCORD, NH 03301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348739152.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ONE Family Exteriors LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ONE Family Exteriors LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
23 WASHINGTON STREET
City
CONCORD
State
NH
ZIP
03301
Mailing
34 D STREET UNIT 1, LOWELL, MA 01851
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2026
Abate by
Apr 3, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,703 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1702.8
  • · Z (S) $2838

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $2,383 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Site- On or about December 4, 2026 an employee fell approximately 21 feet while working from the roof without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2383.2
  • · Z (S) $3972

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,703 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body belt was not located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.  Site- On or about December 4, 2025 employees working from the roof were not protected from bodily injury where personal fall arrest equipment was used, which included connecting lanyards to D rings located at the employee's waist.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1702.8
  • · Z (S) $2838

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2026
Abate by
Apr 3, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,703 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1702.8
  • · Z (S) $2838

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,703 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access roof were not protected from fall hazards where the ladders did not extend three feet above the landing surfaces.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1702.8
  • · Z (S) $2838

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348739152.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.