Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRAMING TECHNOLOGY INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FRAMING TECHNOLOGY INC in 137 SYKE STREET, ROCHESTER, NY 14611 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 348764424.

Watch Framing Technology INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Framing Technology INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
137 SYKE STREET
City
ROCHESTER
State
NY
ZIP
14611
Mailing
137 SYKE STREET, ROCHESTER, NY 14611
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
31
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2026
Abate by
Apr 24, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,628 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a) On or about 02/27/2026 in the production area;  where employees perform covered servicing and/or maintenance operations such as but not limited to changing saw blades on the chop saws without positioning the energy isolating means in the "off" position and locking the energy isolating means for the equipment in the "off" position.  ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3300
  • — Z (S) $5628

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2026
Abate by
Apr 24, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,628 · Current $3,300 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  a) On or about 02/27/2026 throughout establishment; where the employer has a documented Control  of Hazardous Energy (lockout) program but has not performed a review of the program (at least annually). A thorough review would have identified servicing/maintenance operations where lockout was not being utilized.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3300
  • — Z (S) $5628

1910.147 C06 I C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2026
Abate by
Apr 7, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i)(C): Where lockout was used for energy control, the periodic inspection did not include a review, between the inspector and each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected:  a) On or about 02/27/2026 throughout the establishment; where authorized employees perform servicing/maintenance activities covered under the standard, the employer has not performed and documented audits of "authorized" employees performing a lockout in the workplace.  ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2026
Abate by
Apr 24, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,628 · Current $3,400 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii):Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  a) On or about 02/27/2026 in the production area; where the point of operation on the Niagara shear was unguarded.  ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3400
  • — Z (S) $5628

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2026
Abate by
Apr 24, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(6): The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:  a) On or about 02/27/2026 in the warehouse and production areas; where employees operate 3 different fork trucks and a powered pallet jack (COMBI). The powered industrial vehicle training record included only the date of the training.  ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

JELD-WEN

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348764424.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.