MABLETON, GA —
OSHA Inspection: EMMANUEL GUZMAN PEREZ
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of EMMANUEL GUZMAN PEREZ in ASHTON WOODS-MABLETON PKWY, MABLETON, GA 30126 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348777103.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EMMANUEL GUZMAN PEREZ
- Site address
- ASHTON WOODS-MABLETON PKWY
- City
- MABLETON
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30126
- Mailing
- 790 WINDEMERE OAKWAY, LILBURN, GA 30048
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a) Residential: On or about 2/25/26, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that employees were operating Metabo pneumatic nail gun(s) without eye protection while performing framing activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: (a) Residence: On or about 2/25/26 and times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of more than 13 feet to ground level in that an adequate firm foundation was not provided while employees on a pump jack scaffold were performing siding activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. (a) Residence: On or about 2/25/26 and times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards more than 13 feet above ground level in that safe access to the pump jack scaffold was not provided when employees were performing siding activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. (a) Residence: On or about 2/25/26 and times prior the employer exposed employees to fall hazards more than 13 feet to ground level in that the pump jack scaffold was not erected under the direction of a competent person who could identify hazards such as inadequate footing, lack of safe access and no fall protection while employees were using the scaffold to perform siding activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. (a) Residence: On or about 2/25/26 and times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards more than 13 feet above ground level in that fall protection was not provided while employees on a pump jack scaffold were performing siding activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2270
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,838 · Current $2,838
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Residence: On or about 2/25/26 and times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards more than 17 feet above ground level in that the employer did not ensure fall protection was used when employees accessed the roof to install exterior roof insulation.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2838
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348777103.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.