DARIEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: L M MASONRY LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of L M MASONRY LLC in 54 POST ROAD, DARIEN, CT 06820 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 348777376.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- L M MASONRY LLC
- Site address
- 54 POST ROAD
- City
- DARIEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06820
- Mailing
- 240 OLD HAWLEYVILLE ROAD, BETHEL, CT 06801
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,618 · Current $1,809 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): An employee was working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns and was not protected by a protective helmet. Jobsite: On or about February 27, 2026, the employer did not ensure that the site foreman wore a hard hat when positioned under employees working above him, which exposed the site foreman to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1809
- — Z (S) $3618
1926.451 B04
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,618 · Current $1,809 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches (15 cm). Jobsite: On or about February 27, 2026, the employer did not ensure that the scaffold planks on a supported tubular scaffold extended at least six inches over the centerline of the frame. The plank extended approximately three inches over the frame. This exposed employees who were using the scaffold as access and egress from the building to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet, one inch.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1809
- — Z (S) $3618
1926.451 E09 IV
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,618 · Current $1,809 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(9)(iv): Cross braces on tubular welded frame scaffolds were used as a means of access or egress. Jobsite: On or about February 27, 2026, the employer did not ensure that an employee did not climb the scaffold cross-braces to access and egress the top of the building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1809
- — Z (S) $3618
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $5,958 · Current $2,979 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that a metal frame scaffold that the employees were working from was erected under the supervision of a competent person, which exposed the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2979
- — Z (S) $5958
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. Jobsite: On or about February 27, 2026 the employer did not ensure that guardrails were installed along the open ends of the top level of a tubular frame scaffold. Four employees who were working on the scaffold were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet, 1 inch from ground level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G04 XV
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Cross-bracing used in place of a mid-rail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces is between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches ((0.8 M) above the work platform or as a top-rail when the crossing point of two braces is not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches (0.8 m) above the work platform or as a top-rail when the crossing point of two braces is between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform. The endpoints at each upright were more than 48 inches (1.3 m) apart. Jobsite: On or about February 27, 2026, the employer did not ensure that the second level of the scaffold system had a mid-rail installed at the bottom of the cross-brace. This exposed employees who were using the scaffold as access and egress from the building to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet, one inch.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $5,958 · Current $2,979 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Worksite: The employees who were working from the metal frame scaffold that was not erected properly and without fall protection were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2979
- — Z (S) $5958
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Mar 23, 2026
- Abate by
- Apr 16, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years. Jobsite: On or about February 27, 2026, the employer did not ensure that the operator of a rough terrain forklift kept his operator certification current.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at L M Masonry LLC
View L M Masonry LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348777376.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.