Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: EAGLE SANDBLASTING AND PAINTING INC

Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of EAGLE SANDBLASTING AND PAINTING INC in 1549 N 4TH ST, MONETT, MO 65708 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 348780446.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eagle Sandblasting and Painting INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eagle Sandblasting and Painting INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1549 N 4TH ST
City
MONETT
State
MO
ZIP
65708
Mailing
4701 CHAPARRAS RUN, ENID, OK 73703
Inspection type
Fatality or catastrophe (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
11
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 D08

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2026
Abate by
Jul 22, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(8): Horizontal lifelines were not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintained a safety factor of at least two:  At a commercial worksite located at 1549 N 4th St, Monett, MO, on or about March 2, 2026, employees were engaged in drilling operations atop a water tower structure approximately one hundred twenty (120) feet above ground level.  The horizontal lifeline was used in a configuration for which it was not designed, exposing workers to a fall hazard. The workers at the site utilized a rope grab device designed specifically for use on a vertical 5/8-inch lifeline. The lifeline was positioned horizontally at foot level, and the rope grab was connected to an employee's right hip D-ring through a shock-absorbing lanyard. This configuration placed the rope grab in an application for which it was not intended, which increased the risk that the grab would not activate or would not activate in a timely manner. One employee fell approximately one hundred twenty (120) feet from the elevated work surface, sustaining fatal injuries. This was documented on or about March 2, 2026.
Recent events (2)
  • · C (S) $4965
  • · Z (S) $4965

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2026
Abate by
Jul 22, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  At a commercial worksite located at 1549 N 4th St, Monett MO, employees engaged in drilling operations atop a water tower were not adequately protected against free fall in excess of six (6) feet, nor protected from contacting a lower level. As a result, one employee fell approximately one hundred twenty (120) feet from the elevated work surface to ground level, sustaining fatal injuries. This was documented on or about March 2, 2026.
Recent events (2)
  • · C (S) $4965
  • · Z (S) $4965

1926.502 D16 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2026
Abate by
Jul 22, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iv): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, did not bring an employee to a complete stop and/or and did not limit maximum deceleration distance to 3.5 feet (1.07 m):  At a commercial worksite located at 1549 N 4th St, Monett MO, employees engaged in drilling operations atop a water tower were not adequately protected from fall hazards, resulting in an employee traveling in excess of three and one-half (3.5) feet during a fall event. The improper rigging and configuration of the system rendered the fall arrest function of the rope grab ineffective, which allowed one employee to fall approximately one hundred twenty (120) feet from the elevated work surface to ground level, sustaining fatal injuries. This was documented on or about March 2, 2026.
Recent events (2)
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2026
Abate by
Jul 22, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body belt was not located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.  At a commercial worksite located at 1549 N 4th St, Monett MO, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from fall hazards. Specifically, an employee engaged in drilling operations atop a water tower was utilizing the hip D-ring as the fall arrest connection point rather than the designated center D-ring located at the center back of the body harness. This was documented on or about March 2, 2026.
Recent events (2)
  • · C (S) $4965
  • · Z (S) $4965

1926.502 D21

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2026
Abate by
Jul 22, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:  At a commercial worksite located at 1549 N 4th St, Monett MO, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from fall hazards. Fall protection equipment with damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components was not removed from service. The pelican hook exhibited extensive paint buildup that obstructed and compromised the functionality of the gate mechanism. This was documented on or about March 2, 2026.
Recent events (2)
  • · C (S) $4965
  • · Z (S) $4965

View Eagle Sandblasting and Painting INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348780446.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.