Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STUART GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STUART GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 51 GROVE AVE, LEOMINSTER, MA 01453 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348820408.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Stuart General Construction Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Stuart General Construction Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
51 GROVE AVE
City
LEOMINSTER
State
MA
ZIP
01453
Mailing
29 ST. JAMES ST., LOWELL, MA 01852
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2026
Abate by
May 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,958 · Current $5,958
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1):  When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:   51 Grove Ave, Leominster, MA:  On March 19, 2026,  employees were exposed to a 24 foot fall hazard when they accessed a ladder jack scaffold platform that was more than 2 feet above the point of access.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5958

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2026
Abate by
May 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(i):  Each employee more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level on a ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:  51 Grove Ave, Leominster, MA:  On March 19, 2026, employees were not protected by personal fall arrest systems while working from ladder jack scaffolds that were 24 feet above the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2026
Abate by
May 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,958 · Current $5,958
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(6):  Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, were closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).  The minimum allowable distance for any level of voltage listed on the table is three feet:  51 Grove Ave, Leominster, MA:  On March 19, 2026, employees erected and worked from an all-metal ladder jack scaffold with one of the of the metal supporting ladders placed within two feet from the building's energized electrical service drop wire.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5958

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2026
Abate by
May 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,958 · Current $5,958
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(7):  Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration.  Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:  51 Grove Ave, Leominster, MA:  On March 19, 2026, employees who erected ladder jack scaffolds were inexperienced, untrained, and not supervised by a competent person.  The lack of training and supervision resulted in scaffold erection deficiencies and their exposure to electrical hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5958

1926.452 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2026
Abate by
May 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,958 · Current $5,958
29 CFR  1926.452(k)(1): Ladder jack scaffold platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m):  51 Grove Ave, Leominster, MA:  On March 19, 2026, two employees worked from a ladder jack scaffold with a platform height of 24 feet above the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5958

1926.452 K02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2026
Abate by
May 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.452(k)(2):  All ladders used to support ladder jack scaffolds did not meet the requirements of subpart X of this part -- Stairways and Ladders. Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not immediately marked in a manner that readily identified them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:  51 Grove Ave, Leominster, MA:  On March 19, 2026, employees worked from ladder jack scaffolds that had a supporting ladder with one supporting foot that was bent and had the access ladder with two bent rungs.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2026
Abate by
May 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $5,958 · Current $5,958
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  51 Grove Ave, Leominster, MA:  On March 19, 2026, the employer had not trained employees who worked from ladder jack scaffolds to recognize the hazards associated and to understand the procedures to minimize those hazards.  The lack of training resulted in employees working from a scaffold with multiple unrecognized hazards that were created during the scaffold erection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5958

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 26, 2026
Abate by
May 12, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question:  51 Grove Ave, Leominster, MA:  On March 19, 2026, employees who erected ladder jack scaffolds had not been not trained by the employer to recognize associated hazards.   The lack of training resulted in multiple unrecognized hazards created during the scaffold erection and use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Stuart General Construction Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348820408.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.