Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAMPE MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RAMPE MANUFACTURING COMPANY in 1246 HIGH STREET, FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH 44077 (NAICS 333999). OSHA activity number 348841800.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rampe Manufacturing Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rampe Manufacturing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1246 HIGH STREET
City
FAIRPORT HARBOR
State
OH
ZIP
44077
Mailing
1246 HIGH STREET, FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH 44077
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333999
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2026
Abate by
Aug 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  On or about March 30, 2026, the employer did not ensure that machine specific procedures for the Bridgeport and WEBB Mills were utilized during service and maintenance tasks. Employees engaged in setup and  tooling changes without all hazardous energies present including but not limited to pneumatic and electrical on the equipment isolated in accordance with the procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2838

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2026
Abate by
Aug 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  On or about March 30, 2026, the employer did not ensure that an annual inspection of the procedures for the control of hazardous energies on equipment had been performed. Equipment within the facility in which employees service, maintain and operate include but are not limited to milling machines, CNC machines, drill presses and other equipment. Hazardous energies present on equipment include but are not limited to hydraulic, mechanical, electrical, and pneumatic.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2838

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2026
Abate by
Aug 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:(a)  On or about March 30, 2026, the employer did not ensure that employees engaged in service and maintenance of equipment which required the isolation of hazardous energies had been trained to performing the task. Employees are tasked with service and maintenance of the Mills and CNC machines. Hazardous energies present on the equipment include but are not limited mechanical, electrical, pneumatic, and gravitational, kinetic.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2838

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 13, 2026
Abate by
Aug 13, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point of operation guards were not designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of their body in the danger zone during the operating cycle:   A. On or about March 24, 2026, the employer did not ensure one or methods of machine guarding was in place on the Bridgeport Mill (serial number 135878). Guarding was not in place to protect employees from the rotating action of the cutting tool at the point of operation during mill production exposing employees to a caught-in or amputation hazard.   B. On or about March 24, 2026, the employer did not ensure one or methods of machine guarding was in place on the WEBB Mill (MFG number 824253). Guarding was not in place to protect employees from the rotating action of the cutting tool at the point of operation during mill production exposing employees to a caught-in or amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $3972

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348841800.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.