Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CAMPOY CONSTRUCTION CORP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CAMPOY CONSTRUCTION CORP in 600 W DICKENS AVE., TAMPA, FL 33629 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348849621.

Watch Campoy Construction Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Campoy Construction Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
600 W DICKENS AVE.
City
TAMPA
State
FL
ZIP
33629
Mailing
12428 N. FLORIDA AVE. LOT6, TAMPA, FL 33612
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1702 · Current $1021 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  In the front yard of a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: On or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards, in that hard hats were not worn by ground employees while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1021.2
  • — Z (S) $1702

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3972 · Current $2383 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)   On a supported scaffold at a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: on or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that the working levels of the platform were not fully planked while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2383.2
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:   On a supported scaffold at a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: on or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that the scaffold legs did not have base plates installed while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.   On a supported scaffold at a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: on or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that a safe access point was not installed while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   On a supported scaffold at a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: on or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that a competent person did not perform an inspection of the scaffold before performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:   On a supported scaffold at a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: on or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that fall protection was not used while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(h)(2): Employees working below a scaffold were not protected from falling tools, materials or equipment in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (h)(2)(i)-(v) of this section:   On a supported scaffold at a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: on or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards, in that toe boards were not installed while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   On a supported scaffold at a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: on or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that training in how to recognize and minimize fall hazards was not given to employees before performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3972 · Current $2383 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On top of a wall at a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: on or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that fall protection was not used while performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2383.2
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   On top of a wall at a residential construction site, located at 600 West Dickens Ave., Tampa, Florida 33629: on or about 4/1/2026, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that training was not given to employees on how to recognize and minimize fall hazards before performing siding work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348849621.