CROWLEY, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: NOE GARCIA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NOE GARCIA in 925 ALMOND BLOSSOM CIRCLE, CROWLEY, TX 76036 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 348857145.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NOE GARCIA
- Site address
- 925 ALMOND BLOSSOM CIRCLE
- City
- CROWLEY
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76036
- Mailing
- 1507 HUDSPETH AVENUE, DALLAS, TX 75211
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238190
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2026
- Abate by
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): On or about March 25, 2026, at 925 Almond Blossom Circle in Crowley, Texas, employees worked from single pole scaffolds that were not fully decked.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3972
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2026
- Abate by
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: On or about March 25, 2026, at 925 Almond Blossom Circle in Crowley, Texas, employees working from heights of more than 10 feet above the lower level from single pole scaffolds were not protected from falling.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3972
1926.452 A04
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2026
- Abate by
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $2,270 · Current $2,270
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(4): Diagonal bracing in both directions were not installed across the entire outside face of all double- and single-pole scaffolds. On or about March 25, 2026, at 925 Almond Blossom Circle in Crowley, Texas, employees performed cornice work from single-pole scaffolds where cross-bracing was not installed.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2270
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2026
- Abate by
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,405 · Current $3,405
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: On or about March 25, 2026 at 925 Almond Blossom Circle in Crowley, Texas, the employer did not provide an extension ladder where employees could access and egress the upper levels.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3405
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2026
- Abate by
- May 19, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: On or about March 25, 2026, at 925 Almond Blossom Circle in Crowley, Texas, the employer did not provide fall hazard training to the employees engaged in cornice work.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $319
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238190)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348857145.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.