Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SANDY LAKE CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SANDY LAKE CONSTRUCTION in 957 BOCKSTOCE AVENUE, CASTLE SHANNON, PA 15234 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348866682.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sandy Lake Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sandy Lake Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
957 BOCKSTOCE AVENUE
City
CASTLE SHANNON
State
PA
ZIP
15234
Mailing
264 CARLTON ROAD, SANDY LAKE, PA 16145
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure:  a) Job site, 957 Bockstoce Avenue, Castle Shannon, PA: On or about April 8, 2026 during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure employees used appropriate fall protection systems/devices where exposed to fall hazards of up to approximately 40 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1450
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $1,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:  a) Job site, 957 Bockstoce Avenue, Castle Shannon, PA: On or about April 8, 2026 during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure employees used appropriate fall protection systems/devices while in an aerial lift basket.   Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1450
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2026
Abate by
Apr 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:   a) Job site, 957 Bockstoce Avenue, Castle Shannon, PA: On or about April 8, 2026 during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure employees were trained in the proper safety protocols to follow while operating an aerial lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.20 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2026
Abate by
Apr 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): A program was not provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employer:   a) Job site, 957 Bockstoce Avenue, Castle Shannon, PA: On or about April 8, 2026 during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure a system of hazard identification and corrections was implemented. Deficiencies noted during the inspection included, but were not  limited to, failing to use appropriate fall protection systems/devices while on a roof or while in an aerial lift basket and not using eye/face protection when using a leaf blower.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348866682.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.