Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: OMAR GARCIA GALIANA

Discrimination inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a discrimination safety inspection of OMAR GARCIA GALIANA in LOT 90 CLARK FARMS, BRASELTON, GA 30517 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348888322.

Watch Omar Garcia Galiana — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Omar Garcia Galiana is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
OMAR GARCIA GALIANA
Site address
LOT 90 CLARK FARMS
City
BRASELTON
State
GA
ZIP
30517
Mailing
3515 PLEASANTDALE ROAD APT 154, DORAVILLE, GA 30340
Inspection type
Discrimination (N)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2838 · Current $2838
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.   a) New construction on Lot 90, located at Clark Farms, Braselton, GA 30517, Left pump jack scaffold: On or about 4/10/2026 the employer exposed employees to approximately 23-foot fall hazards to the lower ground level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in siding installation activities working from a pump jack scaffold system.  b) New construction on Lot 90, located at Clark Farms, Braselton, GA 30517, Right pump jack scaffold: On or about 4/10/2026 the employer exposed employees to approximately 19-foot, 7-inch fall hazards to the lower ground level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in siding installation activities working from a pump jack scaffold system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2838 · Current $2838
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  a) New construction on Lot 90, located at Clark Farms, Braselton, GA 30517, Left cutting station: On or about 4/10/2026 the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards due to silica exposure from cutting Hardie board siding, in that engineering controls, work practices, or respiratory protection as described in Table-1 were not adhered to while using a circular saw with no vacuum.  b) New construction on Lot 90, located at Clark Farms, Braselton, GA 30517, Right cutting station: On or about 4/10/2026 the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards due to silica exposure from cutting Hardie board siding, in that engineering controls, work practices, or respiratory protection as described in Table-1 were not adhered to while using a circular saw with no vacuum.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a) New construction on Lot 90, located at Clark Farms, Braselton, GA 30517: Left & right cutting stations: On or about 4/10/2026 the employer exposed employees to respirable hazards, in that the employer did not assess all employees who may be exposed to silica health hazards through monitoring to ensure they are not overexposed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348888322.