KENNEBUNK, ME —
OSHA Inspection: BOUDREAU & SON CONSTRUCTION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BOUDREAU & SON CONSTRUCTION in 143 BEACH AVENUE, KENNEBUNK, ME 04043 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 348924903.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BOUDREAU & SON CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 143 BEACH AVENUE
- City
- KENNEBUNK
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04043
- Mailing
- 1002 NEW COUNTY ROAD, DAYTON, ME 04005
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- May 18, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Site - An employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge 35 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- May 18, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): The employer did not ensure that all employees were protected from falling by a personal fall protection system while operating an aerial lift: Site - Employer did not ensure that all employees were protected from falling who were using a JLG 860SJ aerial lift.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- May 18, 2026
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 2026
- Penalty
- Initial $3,547 · Current $3,547
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to their work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury: Facility - Employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) pertaining to fall hazards and the use of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348924903.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.