Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ONG CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC.

Unprogrammed Emphasis inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Emphasis safety inspection of ONG CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC. in 518 GLENHAVEN WAY, FAIRBORN, OH 45324 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348973496.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ONG Construction Services LLC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ONG Construction Services LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
518 GLENHAVEN WAY
City
FAIRBORN
State
OH
ZIP
45324
Mailing
500 REGENT DR, MIDDLETOWN, OH 45044
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Emphasis (N)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2026
Abate by
Jul 29, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $4,965
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  a.) On or about March 18, 2026, located on a new residential multi-family complex the employer failed to provide frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite as employees installed handrail on the second level outside walls and as a result employees were exposed to 10'4" fall hazards as no fall protection system was installed and an extension ladder used at an angle greater then a 4-1 ratio.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4965
  • · Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a.) On or about March 18, 2026, located on a new residential multi-family complex the employer failed to unsure a fall protection system was used as employees installed hand rail of the second level outside walls and as a result employees were exposed to 10'4" fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4965

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2026
Abate by
Jul 29, 2026
Penalty
Initial $4,965 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders shall be used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).    a.) On or about March 18, 2026, located on a new residential multi-family complex the employer did not ensure that ladders being used by employees for residential roofing work were set up at an angle equal to one-quarter of the working length (0.25); in that, the ladders were being used at a height of 10'4" with a base distance of 7', instead of 2.5', which is 4.5' too far out and as a result employees were exposed to 10'4" fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4965

1926.1053 B15

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 24, 2026
Abate by
Jul 29, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders shall be inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after any occurrence that could affect their safe use.  a.) On or about March 18, 2026, located on a new residential multi-family complex the employer did not ensure that ladders being used by employees for residential roofing work were inspected by a competent person for visible defects in that the manufacturer instructional labels were missing that disclosed important information for safe use the ladder and as a result employees were exposed to 10'4" fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348973496.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.