Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PARAMO CONSTRUCTION INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PARAMO CONSTRUCTION INC in 185 S MAIN STREET, NEWTON, NH 03858 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348992934.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Paramo Construction INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Paramo Construction INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
185 S MAIN STREET
City
NEWTON
State
NH
ZIP
03858
Mailing
10 FITZPATRICK CIRCLE, BROCKTON, MA 02301
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2026
Abate by
Jul 27, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $2,838
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2838

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2026
Abate by
Jul 27, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(3): Each employee in a hoist area was not protected from falling 6 feet (1.8m) or more to lower levels by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems:   Site- On or about June 9, 2026 an employee working from the flat roof over the entryway fell approximately 11 feet while reaching out over the roof edge to grab a 220 pound roll of rubber roofing being carried up a ladder where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3972

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2026
Abate by
Jul 7, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.   Site- Employees working from multiple flat roof surfaces were not protected from a fall of over 11 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2026
Abate by
Jul 27, 2026
Penalty
Initial $2,838 · Current $2,838
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2838

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2026
Abate by
Jul 27, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while using extension ladders to access work areas were not provided with ladder training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $3,972 · Current $3,972
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(3): Ladders were loaded beyond the maximum intended load for which they are built:    Site- An employee carrying a 220 pound roll of rubber roofing up a Werner aluminum extension ladder exceed the maximum 300 pound capacity of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3972

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2026
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:    Site- An employee was exposed to a fall hazard while carrying a 220 pound roll of rubber roofing up a Werner aluminum extension ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

View Paramo Construction INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 348992934.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.