BETHLEHEM, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: CANADA DRY BOTTLING CO. OF LEHIGH VALLEY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CANADA DRY BOTTLING CO. OF LEHIGH VALLEY in 2172 CITY LINE ROAD, BETHLEHEM, PA 18017 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 865915.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CANADA DRY BOTTLING CO. OF LEHIGH VALLEY
- Site address
- 2172 CITY LINE ROAD
- City
- BETHLEHEM
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18017
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2086
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 1988
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $245 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupation Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to increased risk of musculoskeletal injury: a) Warehouse, delivery truck manual loading operation employees were exposed to increased risk of musculoskeletal injury while loading cases of soft drinks onto trucks, #25, #29, and #33, March 2, 1988. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to implement a comprehensive back and musculoskeletal overexertion injury prevention program. This program should include the implementation of the following steps: STEP 1 - Effective administrative protection, such as employee training, physical assessment, job rotaion, etc. shall be provided as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering or permanent administrative controls can be implemented which will reduce employee exposure to a nominal risk. STEP 2 - Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering or administrative measures to control employee injury due to manual lifting tasks. Engineering controls to reduce musculoskeletal stresses include, but are not limited to job redesign, reduction of the horizontal and vertical load distrance from the body, reduction of the lifting frequency, or weight, and use of mechanical lifting aids. This plan shall include at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this Citation. 1) Evaluation of conditions, locations and manual lifting activities that the employees are performing at the onset of musculoskeletal injuries. 2) Evaluation of applicable control measure(s). 3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures. 4) Monitoring to assure effective utilization of the control measure(s). STEP 3 - Abatement shall have been completed by implementation of feasible engineering administrative controls, upon verification of verification of their effectiveness in reducing the occurrence of musculoskeletal injuries.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $245.00
- · Z (S) $490.00
1910.106 E03 VI
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 1988
- Penalty
- Initial $490 · Current $245 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $245.00
- · Z (S) $490.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 1988
- Penalty
- Initial $420 · Current $210 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $210.00
- · Z (S) $420.00
1903.2 A01
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 1988
- Penalty
- Initial $70 · Current $35 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $35.00
- · Z (O) $70.00
1910.134 E03
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 1988
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.134 F02 I
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 1988
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.134 F02 IV
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 1988
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- May 16, 1988
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- May 16, 1988
1910.157 G04
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- May 31, 1988
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
1910.165 B04
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 1988
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- May 16, 1988
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- May 16, 1988
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- May 16, 1988
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Apr 15, 1988
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 1988
Recent events (2)
- · I (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections at Canada DRY Bottling CO. of Lehigh Valley
View Canada DRY Bottling CO. of Lehigh Valley's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA's own view of this case can be found through its Establishment Search.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.